Cookie and Privacy Settings

This website uses cookies to enable essential functions like the user login and sessions. We also use cookies and third-party tools to improve your surfing experience on preplounge.com. You can choose to activate only essential cookies or all cookies. You can always change your preference in the cookie and privacy settings. This link can also be found in the footer of the site. If you need more information, please visit our privacy policy.

Data processing in the USA: By clicking on "I accept", you also consent, in accordance with article 49 paragraph 1 sentence 1 lit. GDPR, to your data being processed in the USA (by Google LLC, Facebook Inc., LinkedIn Inc., Stripe, Paypal).

Manage settings individually I accept
expert
Expert with best answer

Antonello

98% Recommendation Rate

155 Meetings

5,282 Q&A Upvotes

USD 219 / Coaching

3

Which frameworks to use for M&A vs. PE-fund investment cases?

Hi guys,

so, I understand the difference between an M&A and an investment made by a PE fund (both quite common case types).

But I struggle with finding the right framework for those two types, means often I see no difference between the framework used for an M&A vs. a PE fund case. Sometimes I treat them as identical for this reason.

Any suggestions from experts?

Hi guys,

so, I understand the difference between an M&A and an investment made by a PE fund (both quite common case types).

But I struggle with finding the right framework for those two types, means often I see no difference between the framework used for an M&A vs. a PE fund case. Sometimes I treat them as identical for this reason.

Any suggestions from experts?

3 answers

  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Best Answer
Book a coaching with Antonello

98% Recommendation Rate

155 Meetings

5,282 Q&A Upvotes

USD 219 / Coaching

Hi,
one of the most important aspects to stress in an M&A will be the revenue and cost synergies of the 2 companies.

During a PE investment instead will be crucial to investigate the ability of the target company to increase - in the short-middle term - profit and value. Then, you can think even on synergies with the other firms in the portfolio.

Best,
Antonello

Hi,
one of the most important aspects to stress in an M&A will be the revenue and cost synergies of the 2 companies.

During a PE investment instead will be crucial to investigate the ability of the target company to increase - in the short-middle term - profit and value. Then, you can think even on synergies with the other firms in the portfolio.

Best,
Antonello

Book a coaching with Vlad

97% Recommendation Rate

406 Meetings

11,409 Q&A Upvotes

USD 239 / Coaching

Hi,

You need to ask in the clarifying questions:

  • What are the reasons for the deal and what are the client's objectives
  • Ask if there are any synergies

For consulting interviews, there are two types of frameworks you may use:

  1. Commercial due-diligence of the target company
  2. Synergies calculation of two merging companies

Note also that it can be a mix of both.

1. For Due Diligence you can use the following structure:

Market

  • Size
  • Growth rates
  • Profitability
  • Segments
  • Distribution channels

Competition

  • Market shares of competitors and their segments (see the next point)
  • Concentration / fragmentation (Fragmented market with lots of small players is less mature and easier to enter from a scratch. Concentrated market is hard to enter but has potential acquisition targets)
  • Unit economics of the players (Margins, relative cost position)
  • Key capabilities of the players (e.g. suppliers, assets, IP, etc)

Company

  • Revenues and growth rates
  • Profit
  • Unit economics (Margins, costs) in current or target markets
  • Brand
  • Product mix
  • Key capabilities

Feasibility of exit (in case of a PE company):

  • Exit valuation
  • Exit time
  • Existence of buyers
  • Risks

2. For Synergies Calculation you can use the following structure:

  1. Revenue synergies - here you calculate the synergies in price and quantity (depending on the case it may be new geographies, new products, new distribution channels, bigger share on shelves crosselling opportunities, etc.)
  2. Cost synergies - typically you use a value chain structure tailored to the industry (e.g. supply-production-distribution-marketing-after sales support)
  3. Financial synergies - working capital, capital structure, tax (can be neglected in consulting cases)
  4. Risks - major risks that can decrease the synergies (tip: don't underestimate the merging companies culture factor)
  5. Total synergies potential in $, adjusted by risk (probability of failure)

Good luck!

Hi,

You need to ask in the clarifying questions:

  • What are the reasons for the deal and what are the client's objectives
  • Ask if there are any synergies

For consulting interviews, there are two types of frameworks you may use:

  1. Commercial due-diligence of the target company
  2. Synergies calculation of two merging companies

Note also that it can be a mix of both.

1. For Due Diligence you can use the following structure:

Market

  • Size
  • Growth rates
  • Profitability
  • Segments
  • Distribution channels

Competition

  • Market shares of competitors and their segments (see the next point)
  • Concentration / fragmentation (Fragmented market with lots of small players is less mature and easier to enter from a scratch. Concentrated market is hard to enter but has potential acquisition targets)
  • Unit economics of the players (Margins, relative cost position)
  • Key capabilities of the players (e.g. suppliers, assets, IP, etc)

Company

  • Revenues and growth rates
  • Profit
  • Unit economics (Margins, costs) in current or target markets
  • Brand
  • Product mix
  • Key capabilities

Feasibility of exit (in case of a PE company):

  • Exit valuation
  • Exit time
  • Existence of buyers
  • Risks

2. For Synergies Calculation you can use the following structure:

  1. Revenue synergies - here you calculate the synergies in price and quantity (depending on the case it may be new geographies, new products, new distribution channels, bigger share on shelves crosselling opportunities, etc.)
  2. Cost synergies - typically you use a value chain structure tailored to the industry (e.g. supply-production-distribution-marketing-after sales support)
  3. Financial synergies - working capital, capital structure, tax (can be neglected in consulting cases)
  4. Risks - major risks that can decrease the synergies (tip: don't underestimate the merging companies culture factor)
  5. Total synergies potential in $, adjusted by risk (probability of failure)

Good luck!

Book a coaching with Henning

100% Recommendation Rate

172 Meetings

5,009 Q&A Upvotes

USD 189 / Coaching

By and large, M&A and PE cases are very similar, but there are differences:

Similarities: In both situations, the client considers buying an asset, so you need to assess the asset itself. Meaning market, competitors, positioning with taylored focus in your framework based on the case context and your own experience (if applicable) with the industry.

Differences: The key difference between M&A and PE is what your client does with the asset after the acquisition. While there are PE funds that have a portfolio approach and could have in mind to merge the asset withe one of their competitors, this is an exception rather than the rule. Typical post-acquisition strategies are include revenue growth or cost reduction from within (new sales approach, new product line, cutting administrative slack, etc.). The key question is: "What can you do with this company to make it more valuable?"

In an M&A setup, this is just the oppositve. Most corporate buyers buy the target with a very specific strategic vision: revenue or cost synergies with the existing business, complimenting customer segments, strategic market entries, etc. Key question here is: "Why is this company worth more to your client than to anybody else?"

In any of these cases, your framework should address the post acquisition (or merger) strategy, and it should identify the key issues upfront based on the context you get from the interviewer.

By and large, M&A and PE cases are very similar, but there are differences:

Similarities: In both situations, the client considers buying an asset, so you need to assess the asset itself. Meaning market, competitors, positioning with taylored focus in your framework based on the case context and your own experience (if applicable) with the industry.

Differences: The key difference between M&A and PE is what your client does with the asset after the acquisition. While there are PE funds that have a portfolio approach and could have in mind to merge the asset withe one of their competitors, this is an exception rather than the rule. Typical post-acquisition strategies are include revenue growth or cost reduction from within (new sales approach, new product line, cutting administrative slack, etc.). The key question is: "What can you do with this company to make it more valuable?"

In an M&A setup, this is just the oppositve. Most corporate buyers buy the target with a very specific strategic vision: revenue or cost synergies with the existing business, complimenting customer segments, strategic market entries, etc. Key question here is: "Why is this company worth more to your client than to anybody else?"

In any of these cases, your framework should address the post acquisition (or merger) strategy, and it should identify the key issues upfront based on the context you get from the interviewer.

Related case(s)

General Holding

Solved 44.7k times
General Holding Our client is a French holding company with annual revenues of about €1 billion.      Their portfolio consists of different companies that are mostly in manufacturing industries such as the oil & gas industry and the automotive industry.They do not have a specific investment focus. They prefer to buy the best companies available that are also related to their existing businesses. They are thinking about acquiring an auto parts dealer, OTOpart, and want to know whether you think it is a good idea.
4.3 5 1540
| Rating: (4.3 / 5.0) |

Our client is a French holding company with annual revenues of about €1 billion. Their portfolio consists of different companies that are mostly in manufacturing industries such as the oil & gas industry and the automotive industry.They do not have a specific investment focus. They prefer to ... Open whole case

Chip equity

Solved 37.2k times
Chip equity Our client is an electronics holding called Chip’n’Chip. They want to invest in a Printed Circuit Board (PCB) manufacturer called OnBoard, and asked you whether it’s going to be a good investment. How would you help them?
4.5 5 1296
| Rating: (4.5 / 5.0) |

Our client is an electronics holding called Chip’n’Chip. They want to invest in a Printed Circuit Board (PCB) manufacturer called OnBoard, and asked you whether it’s going to be a good investment. How would you help them? Open whole case

MBB Final Round Case - Smart Education

Solved 16.8k times
MBB Final Round Case - Smart Education Our client is SmartBridge, a nonprofit educational institution offering face-to-face tutoring services. The client operates in the US. The mission of SmartBridge is to help as many students as possible to complete studies and prevent that they drop from the school system, in particular in disadvantaged areas. The client is considering starting operations for its services in the Chicago area. They hired us to understand if that makes sense. Due to the nonprofit regulation, SmartBridge should operate on its own in the market, without any partnership. How would you help our client?
4.6 5 592
| Rating: (4.6 / 5.0)

Our client is SmartBridge, a nonprofit educational institution offering face-to-face tutoring services. The client operates in the US. The mission of SmartBridge is to help as many students as possible to complete studies and prevent that they drop from the school system, in particular in disadvant ... Open whole case

Paper Print

Solved 16.0k times
Paper Print A printing company is planning to take over another printing company with similar technology and printing machines. The candidate is supposed to evaluate the acquisition by answering a line of questions that are presented in the “suggested approach” section.
4.2 5 353
| Rating: (4.2 / 5.0) |

A printing company is planning to take over another printing company with similar technology and printing machines. The candidate is supposed to evaluate the acquisition by answering a line of questions that are presented in the “suggested approach” section. Open whole case

SuperBurger

Solved 14.4k times
SuperBurger Our client is SuperBurger, a fast food chain that operates in the same class as McDonalds, Wendy's, Burger King and so on. They're the fourth largest fast food chain worldwide in terms of number of stores in operations. SuperBurger owns some of its stores, but 85% of its stores are owned by franchisees. As part of its growth strategy, the company has analyzed some potential acquisition targets including Tasty Donuts which is a growing doughnut producer active in the US and internationally.  The client asked us to help him decide whether he should acquire the company or not. 
4.0 5 1214
| Rating: (4.0 / 5.0)

Our client is SuperBurger, a fast food chain that operates in the same class as McDonalds, Wendy's, Burger King and so on. They're the fourth largest fast food chain worldwide in terms of number of stores in operations. SuperBurger owns some of its stores, but 85% of its stores are owned by franchis ... Open whole case