Ex-MBB, Experienced Hire; I will teach you not only the how, but also the why of case interviews
Book a coaching

Top-Down Communication

Someone asked on Oct 12, 2018 - 3 answers

Lets say you want to communicate your issue tree in a top-down way, and that you have a three layer structure. I certainly think it makes sense to go through all the categories you have in the first layer first, but when communicating the second layer, should I take one category and then communicate the buckets from the third layer that is "below" that category, or should I go through all categories at layer two before communicating layer three? Isn't it hard for the interviewer to follow if I use that approach?

  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Guennael replied on Oct 13, 2018
Ex-MBB, Experienced Hire; I will teach you not only the how, but also the why of case interviews

Your first option is right. Here is how I coach it:

1. Build the issue tree, start from the top and repeat the question

2. Go down one level, and just count + list all the big branches of the framework ("go horizontal")

3. Go back to the first branch, and describe it / explain what you want to know there ("go vertical"), then explain you go the the next branch (you need to remind me what that branch is by the way, and perhaps even the number it was associated with) and repeat

As you present the structure, I expect you to go at least 2 levels deep, but 3 is best. Someone today asked me if they should go to a 4th level... No! 4th is too much, and you likely won't have time to prepare or present to that granularity in a case anyway.

Vlad replied on Oct 12, 2018
McKinsey / Accenture / Got all BIG3 offers / More than 300 real MBB cases / Harvard Business School


  • Do the 1st level first
  • Do the 2nd and the third level together

Here is the tip: Rotate your paper and walk the interviewer through your structure with a pen. Thus your logic will be clear to him.


replied on Oct 12, 2018
Bain & Company | University of Cambridge | CV/Resume writing | 770 GMAT

Easier to answer your question by giving you an example: how I would communicate a Structure top down:

Top level: "To answer this question I would like at three things: Firstly, The market's attractiveness, secondly, the company's attractiveness, and thirdly, the associated risks"

Middle/third level: "...For risks, I would like to look at two types of risks: firstly, non financial risks, and secondly, financial risks. Under non-financial risks, I'd look at A, B, C. Under Financial risks, I'd look at X, Y, Z"

So, to summarise: Do the "2nd level within one of your top level buckets together, then deep dive into sub-bucket 1 and sub-bucket 2 etc. (as above). However, you shouldn't go through all of your level 2 buckets across your level 1 buckets together - as you note, this would be hard to follow.

Related case(s)

Best Tablets Company

Solved 300+ times
4.0 5 19
| Rating: (4.0 / 5.0)

Best Tablets is one of the important companies in the world of high technology and communications. However, they have been witnessing a continual decrease in their profit for the last years and they want to come up with a strategy to get them back on track. Open whole case