Cookie and Privacy Settings

This website uses cookies to enable essential functions like the user login and sessions. We also use cookies and third-party tools to improve your surfing experience on preplounge.com. You can choose to activate only essential cookies or all cookies. You can always change your preference in the cookie and privacy settings. This link can also be found in the footer of the site. If you need more information, please visit our privacy policy.

Data processing in the USA: By clicking on "I accept", you also consent, in accordance with article 49 paragraph 1 sentence 1 lit. GDPR, to your data being processed in the USA (by Google LLC, Facebook Inc., LinkedIn Inc., Stripe, Paypal).

Manage settings individually I accept
expert
Expert with best answer

Sidi

99% Recommendation Rate

426 Meetings

4,129 Q&A Upvotes

USD 449 / Coaching

1

Structure: What is the required depth and specificness of McKinsey frameworks?

Hi all,

often heard McKinsey requires very broad while very specific framework, what does that mean?

Example Case Question: Client wants to acquire a firm and has three targets between which he needs to decide (all in different industries, Hospital Software, Website development, inventory software):

Question 1: How to approach this problem?

"Would look into:

1) Market attractivity:

Dynamics:

  • How big are the different market segments?
  • What is their growth?
  • What is the outlook over the next years, any major trends?

Competition:

  • What is the competitive situation? (Concentration, USP of competition, their reactions)
  • What is the market share of the target in the respective market?

Customer:

  • Which segments are there?
  • What drives their demand, what is their willingness to pay?

Entry Barriers:

  • Are there any entry barriers in the specific market (i.e. regulatory constraints like required health care licenses)

2) Target positioning within market

  • What products/services does the target offer? (USP, patents)
  • Where do they sell their products (overlap with client somewhere?)
  • What's the image of the company in the market?
  • Do they focus on specific customer segments within market? (how do they compare to our client?)
  • How is the target culture? (how compared to our client?)
  • What is the ownership structure (private, public?)

3) Financial attractivity

Expected revenues:

  • Revenues generated by target
  • Sales synergies (i.e. cross-selling potential, cannibalization potential)

Expected costs:

  • Price of target/ upfront investment costs
  • Recurring costs of target operation
  • Cost synergies (i.e. best practice sharing, economies of scale etc.)

Compare ROI, payback time, NPV of targets

4) Company + Capabilities

  • What products, customer segment and geographies do we serve?
  • What would add value to our existing customers? (i.e. do we already have hospitals, we can now sell additional software?)
  • Acquisition experience?
  • Financial warchest (can we acquire only one or several firms)"

Would a structure like this be too broad?

Thanks in advance.

Hi all,

often heard McKinsey requires very broad while very specific framework, what does that mean?

Example Case Question: Client wants to acquire a firm and has three targets between which he needs to decide (all in different industries, Hospital Software, Website development, inventory software):

Question 1: How to approach this problem?

"Would look into:

1) Market attractivity:

Dynamics:

  • How big are the different market segments?
  • What is their growth?
  • What is the outlook over the next years, any major trends?

Competition:

  • What is the competitive situation? (Concentration, USP of competition, their reactions)
  • What is the market share of the target in the respective market?

Customer:

  • Which segments are there?
  • What drives their demand, what is their willingness to pay?

Entry Barriers:

  • Are there any entry barriers in the specific market (i.e. regulatory constraints like required health care licenses)

2) Target positioning within market

  • What products/services does the target offer? (USP, patents)
  • Where do they sell their products (overlap with client somewhere?)
  • What's the image of the company in the market?
  • Do they focus on specific customer segments within market? (how do they compare to our client?)
  • How is the target culture? (how compared to our client?)
  • What is the ownership structure (private, public?)

3) Financial attractivity

Expected revenues:

  • Revenues generated by target
  • Sales synergies (i.e. cross-selling potential, cannibalization potential)

Expected costs:

  • Price of target/ upfront investment costs
  • Recurring costs of target operation
  • Cost synergies (i.e. best practice sharing, economies of scale etc.)

Compare ROI, payback time, NPV of targets

4) Company + Capabilities

  • What products, customer segment and geographies do we serve?
  • What would add value to our existing customers? (i.e. do we already have hospitals, we can now sell additional software?)
  • Acquisition experience?
  • Financial warchest (can we acquire only one or several firms)"

Would a structure like this be too broad?

Thanks in advance.

(edited)

1 answer

  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Best Answer
Book a coaching with Sidi

99% Recommendation Rate

426 Meetings

4,129 Q&A Upvotes

USD 449 / Coaching

Hi!

Just three quick comments:

  1. The structure does not make logic sense, since 3) is determined by 1) and 2). Hence, this logical relation should be made explicit, and it does not make too much sense to look at these elements in isolation from each other. (I know it is how case approaches are taught in most books, but it nevertheless rests on flwaed thinking).
  2. Moreover, it does not take into account the central purpose of a structure: to explain to the intervewer how you will answer the precise question of the client (it is NOT to show the interviewer what you want to look into, as this ultimately serves no purpose).
  3. As a corollary of the second comment, the criterion according to which you will get to an answer is lacking, which makes the whole approach somewhat blurry and, thereby, will make your life unnecessarily difficult while navigating through the case.

So a rigorous framework should start with the precise question, define the criterion according to which the question can be answered (for this you have to verify the objective first before starting with the structure!), then disaggregate the elements of this criterion into their component parts, and finally identifiying the qualtiative drivers which influence these component parts. This contains all what you have outlined above, but in a much more rigorous logical way, and it gives you a complete roadmap for the entire case.

Cheers, Sidi

Hi!

Just three quick comments:

  1. The structure does not make logic sense, since 3) is determined by 1) and 2). Hence, this logical relation should be made explicit, and it does not make too much sense to look at these elements in isolation from each other. (I know it is how case approaches are taught in most books, but it nevertheless rests on flwaed thinking).
  2. Moreover, it does not take into account the central purpose of a structure: to explain to the intervewer how you will answer the precise question of the client (it is NOT to show the interviewer what you want to look into, as this ultimately serves no purpose).
  3. As a corollary of the second comment, the criterion according to which you will get to an answer is lacking, which makes the whole approach somewhat blurry and, thereby, will make your life unnecessarily difficult while navigating through the case.

So a rigorous framework should start with the precise question, define the criterion according to which the question can be answered (for this you have to verify the objective first before starting with the structure!), then disaggregate the elements of this criterion into their component parts, and finally identifiying the qualtiative drivers which influence these component parts. This contains all what you have outlined above, but in a much more rigorous logical way, and it gives you a complete roadmap for the entire case.

Cheers, Sidi

Related BootCamp article(s)

Interviewer-Led vs Candidate-Led cases

Case Interviews can be led by the candidate or by the interviewer: In Candidate-led cases the main challenge is the structure. In Interviewer-led cases the main challenge is to adapt quickly

Related case(s)

McKinsey Questions

Solved 39.3k times
McKinsey Questions Tell me of a situation where you had an opinion and no one seemed to agree with you. What was your goal when you decided to join university / work / clubs / a sports team? Did you have a goal that you were not able to reach? What did you do? What do you want to be remembered for and how are you achieving it? What is your typical way of dealing with conflict?
4.5 5 862
| Rating: (4.5 / 5.0) |
Difficulty: Intermediate | Style: Fit Interview | Topics: Personal fit

Tell me of a situation where you had an opinion and no one seemed to agree with you. What was your goal when you decided to join university / work / clubs / a sports team? Did you have a goal that you were not able to reach? What did you do? What do you want to be remembered for and how are you ... Open whole case

MBB Final Round Case - Smart Education

Solved 16.4k times
MBB Final Round Case - Smart Education Our client is SmartBridge, a nonprofit educational institution offering face-to-face tutoring services. The client operates in the US. The mission of SmartBridge is to help as many students as possible to complete studies and prevent that they drop from the school system, in particular in disadvantaged areas. The client is considering starting operations for its services in the Chicago area. They hired us to understand if that makes sense. Due to the nonprofit regulation, SmartBridge should operate on its own in the market, without any partnership. How would you help our client?
4.6 5 561
| Rating: (4.6 / 5.0)

Our client is SmartBridge, a nonprofit educational institution offering face-to-face tutoring services. The client operates in the US. The mission of SmartBridge is to help as many students as possible to complete studies and prevent that they drop from the school system, in particular in disadvant ... Open whole case

Motivational questions – FIT interview preparation

Solved 3.9k times
Motivational questions – FIT interview preparation During this exercise, we will deep-dive in 4 of the most common Motivational questions asked in FIT interviews:   Why Consulting? Why this particular company? (McKinsey, Bain, BCG, others) Why this particular location? *Particularly relevant to people re-locating or choosing an office not in their region Why this particular specialized business function *Only relevant when not applying for a general role (e.g., McKinsey Advanced Analytics, BCG Gamma, etc.) *box-open green* *See Graph 1 – Note: "Motivational" are one of the 4 types of questions you can find in FIT interviews. *box-close* ➥ Graphs from the Integrated FIT Guide for MBB
4.5 5 62
| Rating: (4.5 / 5.0)
Difficulty: Intermediate | Style: Fit Interview | Topics: Personal fit

During this exercise, we will deep-dive in 4 of the most common Motivational questions asked in FIT interviews: Why Consulting? Why this particular company? (McKinsey, Bain, BCG, others) Why this particular location? *Particularly relevant to people re-locating or choosing an office not ... Open whole case

Introduction and CV questions – FIT interview preparation

Solved 3.4k times
Introduction and CV questions – FIT interview preparation During this exercise, we will deep-dive in 3 of the most common Intro & CV questions asked in FIT interviews:  1. Walk me through your CV 2. Tell me about yourself 3. Tell me about the thing that makes you most proud on your CV   *box-open green* *See Graph 1 – Note: "Intro & CV questions" are one of the 4 types of questions you can find in FIT interviews. *box-close* ➥ Graphs from the Integrated FIT Guide for MBB    
4.6 5 58
| Rating: (4.6 / 5.0)
Difficulty: Intermediate | Style: Fit Interview | Topics: Personal fit

During this exercise, we will deep-dive in 3 of the most common Intro & CV questions asked in FIT interviews: 1. Walk me through your CV 2. Tell me about yourself 3. Tell me about the thing that makes you most proud on your CV *See Graph 1 – Note: "Intro & CV questions" are one of the 4 ty ... Open whole case

Cutting Carbs - Divestiture in the Electrical Power Market

Solved 1.5k times
Cutting Carbs - Divestiture in the Electrical Power Market Our client is Energy England, one of northern England’s largest electric utility companies. They were created over the past decade through an aggressive series of mergers of existing utility companies each specializing in a single energy generation source. Recently, the CEO has embarked on an initiative to return to the core of the business. She is looking to increase free cash flow and cash reserves in order to prepare the business for evolving future trends.   The following can be verbally provided to interviewee if asked: Energy England is made up of assets across the energy-generation space. These include coal, gas, nuclear, and wind We are looking to divest from just one of our previous acquisitions (i.e one target is sufficient) There are no specific goals/metrics – the client trusts our judgement
4.3 5 26
| Rating: (4.3 / 5.0)

Our client is Energy England, one of northern England’s largest electric utility companies. They were created over the past decade through an aggressive series of mergers of existing utility companies each specializing in a single energy generation source. Recently, the CEO has embarked on an initi ... Open whole case