Hi there,

congratulations on your offer! It is pretty standard to have non-compete clauses in some geographies – I had one myself in my contract. However, normally the clause implies you cannot work for clients or direct competitors of the client for a certain period of time, not for a MBB competitor.

In any case, I would not worry much as:

• I never heard of an MBB company suing a former employee for violating a non-compete clause. Employees leaving MBB are possible future clients – the company usually wants to leave in good terms. The only situation where a non-compete clause may have some real weight is if you leave as a partner (bringing away clients)
• You may want to double-check the US regulation, but at least in some countries in Europe the clause cannot be applied if they don’t provide some sort of compensation
• Contracts are standard – you may double-check with some alumni, but I guess this is what everyone in your geography has

Best,

Francesco

I confirm that is standard only for some geographies, I didn't have one in Italy.

Best,
Luca

Hi A,

I did not have that close when I worked at Roland Berger in Eastern and Western Europe (Kyiv and Munich), but this indeed became a part of my contract when I moved to the Middle East (Dubai). having received multiple offers in Dubai i also faced non-competitive clause in some of them (Strategy & and Kearney) but not all (no such clause at MBB or Oliver Wymann).

Therefore, it really depends on the company and geography.

And 8 months are not 2 years - so in the worst case you can do a sabbatical or MBA between jobs ;)

Hope it helps - keep safe and stay healthy!

Best,

André

Agree with others that this could be very geo specific. In Southeast Asia I am pretty sure there is no such clauses for roles below Partner (for Partner yes there is non-compete for a period of time). I didn't have such clauses in either my BCG or Bain offers.

Best,

Emily

Hi,

It doesn't seem to be a standard clause here in India. Folks keep switching between the firms as well. And as someone pointed out, the Consultants are potential future Clients, hence the risk of any legal lawsuit should be minimal.

However, please check with other folks from the US, especially those who have made a switch.

Hello!

I didn´t have one myself, I suppose this is a geography-base thing.

In any case, I have never heard of this being an issue when joining MBB for collagues who came from other consulting firms.

The only situation where you can indeed have conflict is when you have client specific know-how or sensible infromation. In these cases, you will be "banned" to work on this same industry for a while.

This happens also internally in MBBs: if you have done extensive work, for instance, for Telefónica, you won´t be working with Orange any time soon.

Hope it helps!

Cheers,

Clara

Hi Anonymous,

Non-competition clause are definitley not standard in MBB contracts I saw from different geographies.

If you already started working there I would anyway wait until this issue becomes relevant; otherwise (and especially if you have alternatives) I would double-check with a lawyer if your non-competition clause would be even enforcable by law or not.

It's good to know your legal position - independent from the fact that I never heard of any case that a former consulting company was sueing a former employee... don't think that would add positively to any firm's reputation!

Hope that helps - if so, please give it a thumbs-up with the green upvote button below!

Robert

Hi, I confirm it's not a standard but it depends on the geography.

Best,
Antonello