Hi,

Sidi and Frederic have provided really detailed and great points already. 

I worked in BCG's PIPE practice and was also part of the Corporate Finance & Strategy practice (of which M&A is a subset). I'll add some more actual nuance based on my experience:

• M&A deals may not have an explicit exit, but sometimes they will have still have internal profitability targets
• M&A deals may have multiple objectives - it may not always be a simple ‘profit’ objective
  • E.g. sometimes players choose to buy over a less profitable business in order to maintain competitive advantage / deny competitors
  • E.g. sometimes the key focus of the M&A is to access or leverage a specific capability/operational excellence
• PE deals always have an exit - but sometimes PE players also go through M&A for their portfolio companies - e.g. bolt-on strategy
  • In this scenario, the bolt-in acquisition is not meant to be exited, but rather to add value to the original portfolio company

So this leads to the point that you should never assume. Always clarify the objectives and the context, and then break down the problem in a way that is relevant to the question. Sounds easy, but hard to execute on-the-spot consistently :)

All the best!

Hi there,

Love the other answers here.

Most case goals are for profits BUT you always have to check.

PE firms will ultimately sell the firm while in an M&A that's not generally the end goal.

Always ask/check with the interviewer.

=========================================

PE firms specifically go out and buy companies in order to make money from them (i.e. they either expect future profits to do well or they want to re-jig some things to add value). They're basically investment shops buying assets.

An M&A is when a "normal" company wants another company because they see value to their existing business. This is a much more "personal" decision and can often be tied to another objective rather than just pure profits (i.e. could be growth, market entry, facing off competition, etc.)

(edited)

Hi there! You're on the right track in distinguishing between regular M&A deals and Private Equity (PE) buyouts, but let's delve a bit deeper to clarify the differences.

In M&A deals, as you rightly mentioned, companies often seek synergies, which can encompass various aspects such as operational efficiencies, cost savings, and, indeed, company culture alignment. The aim here can be broader and can involve strategic, long-term considerations. M&A deals often involve two operating companies combining their resources, expertise, and market presence to create a more robust entity.

On the other hand, PE buyouts are primarily financially driven transactions. PE firms acquire companies with the primary objective of generating attractive returns on investment. Unlike M&A, where the focus is often on how two companies can work together, PE buyouts are typically not about synergies between the acquiring firm and the target company. The emphasis is more on enhancing the target company's financial performance, often through operational improvements and cost optimization.

While company culture can be relevant in PE buyouts, it doesn't play as central a role as in M&A. PE firms tend to be more hands-on in terms of managing the companies they acquire, with a strong focus on increasing profitability and driving financial performance.

In PE deals, the evaluation centers around the financials, market dynamics, and the value proposition of the target company. The emphasis is on enhancing the target company's market position, revenue growth, and profitability, which aligns with the PE firm's goal of realizing a profitable exit within a certain time frame.

So, in summary, you're correct in your understanding. For PE deals, the spotlight is on the financial numbers, market potential, and enhancing the acquired company's value, while the concept of synergies takes a different form than in traditional M&A deals.

If you have more specific questions or need further insights into either M&A or PE transactions, feel free to ask!

Warm regards, Frederic

Some confusion here. The goal is always to make profit. And while they may have different goals in general, the only way to know what is the goal is… to ask the interviewer.

Here what you want to know is… what is the goal of the investment and what is the investment strategy / investment thesis!

In reality, you can have a PE fund pursuing a Buy and Build strategy, and they're looking for bolt on acquisitions. So in that case, there may be synergies, even being a PE the acquiror.

I don't like “case categorization”, but if you are going to do so, please understand that you can only do it AFTER you know what is the exact scope and goal of the case, and never before that.

Lots of great answers below as well. 

Aside from this, I'd suggest to actually use this as a networking question. Aim to connect with people in the field who are at a seniority level similar to the one that you're aiming for, ideally new joiners, and they should give a more granular perspective of what the day to day work looks like. If the conversation goes well, they might even be willing to refer you for the job. 

Sharing with you a guide on how to conduct these conversations:

• Expert Guide: How To Handle Networking Calls and Get Referrals

Best,
Cristian

———————————————

Practicing for interviews? Check out my latest case based on a first-round MBB interview >>> SoyTechnologies  

You're on the right track! In M&A deals, companies often seek synergies and look for ways to work well together, including aligning company cultures. This is because M&A deals typically involve the combination of two existing companies, where the goal is to create value through the integration of operations, resources, and capabilities.

On the other hand, in Private Equity (PE) buyouts, the main goal is indeed to earn profit. PE firms are financial investors that acquire companies with the intention of improving their financial performance and ultimately generating a return on investment. Unlike M&A deals, PE buyouts are not focused on creating synergies between the acquiring company and the target company.

Instead, in PE deals, the focus is primarily on the financial numbers and the potential for value creation. PE firms evaluate the market attractiveness, growth potential, and financial health of the target company. They assess factors such as revenue growth, profitability, cash flow generation, and potential cost efficiencies. The aim is to identify opportunities to enhance the financial performance of the target company and generate a favorable return on investment.

While company culture may not be a primary consideration in PE buyouts, it is still important to assess the management team and their ability to execute the value creation plan. PE firms often work closely with the management team to implement strategic initiatives and operational improvements that can drive financial performance.

So, in summary, you are correct that PE deals typically focus more on the financial aspects, such as market potential and the value of the company being bought, rather than seeking synergies or emphasizing company culture. If you have any further questions or need more clarification, feel free to ask!