Cookie and Privacy Settings

This website uses cookies to enable essential functions like the user login and sessions. We also use cookies and third-party tools to improve your surfing experience on preplounge.com. You can choose to activate only essential cookies or all cookies. You can always change your preference in the cookie and privacy settings. This link can also be found in the footer of the site. If you need more information, please visit our privacy policy.

Data processing in the USA: By clicking on "I accept", you also consent, in accordance with article 49 paragraph 1 sentence 1 lit. GDPR, to your data being processed in the USA (by Google LLC, Facebook Inc., LinkedIn Inc., Stripe, Paypal).

Manage settings individually I accept
4

How to test a hypothesis?

I would like to know "how to test a hypothesis". I have an overview of the structure (to verify hypothesis X, I need to proove that A, B, C factors are true). However, in the case of "I hypothesize that this profitability drop is due to revenue drop, due to client preference change", how do I test this specific hypothesis?

Could I say something like, I need to drill down the root cause first. So after confirming that this is a revenue problem, I would look into price and quantity, and the relevant factors linked. If the other factors are not true, then it must be due to customer demand change. In another way, I can say that the company should benchmark what others are doing (if others are making changes to fulfill client demand, we are not, then this must be the root cause).

Appreciate any thoughts. Thanks!

I would like to know "how to test a hypothesis". I have an overview of the structure (to verify hypothesis X, I need to proove that A, B, C factors are true). However, in the case of "I hypothesize that this profitability drop is due to revenue drop, due to client preference change", how do I test this specific hypothesis?

Could I say something like, I need to drill down the root cause first. So after confirming that this is a revenue problem, I would look into price and quantity, and the relevant factors linked. If the other factors are not true, then it must be due to customer demand change. In another way, I can say that the company should benchmark what others are doing (if others are making changes to fulfill client demand, we are not, then this must be the root cause).

Appreciate any thoughts. Thanks!

4 answers

  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Book a coaching with Luca

100% Recommendation Rate

41 Meetings

2,352 Q&A Upvotes

USD 189 / Coaching

Hello,

Don't lose your time trying to understand how to formally test an hypothesis. It's not mandatory to say "to verify hypothesis X, I need to proove that A, B, C factors are true".
More over, you can never say that "since the other factors are not true, it has to be in the other way". You have always to be fact based and to prove your recommendations.
It's enough to have an hypothesis in your head and to drill down the different parts of your frameworks until you don't find the real root cause.

Best,
Luca

Hello,

Don't lose your time trying to understand how to formally test an hypothesis. It's not mandatory to say "to verify hypothesis X, I need to proove that A, B, C factors are true".
More over, you can never say that "since the other factors are not true, it has to be in the other way". You have always to be fact based and to prove your recommendations.
It's enough to have an hypothesis in your head and to drill down the different parts of your frameworks until you don't find the real root cause.

Best,
Luca

Book a coaching with Ian

100% Recommendation Rate

184 Meetings

14,939 Q&A Upvotes

USD 289 / Coaching

I think you need a specific example here not general rules. So, here goes.

First, unless you've been given some clear evidence, don't say "I hypothesize this is due to a R drop". What if the interviewer goes "why?"

Now, if our prompt is about a retailer in a middle America mall, ok, that hypothesis could be right (i.e. online threat, economic stagnating region, etc.). But, lacking that, your hypothesis should actually be more about "what do I need to find an answer".

So, you could say something like "to figure out what's happening here, I need to identify 1) If this is an "us" or the general world problem". If it's an "us" problem, what are we doing wrong? If it's a world problem, what is it specifically, and what can we do to fix it?

2) If it's an "us" problem, is this due to falling revenue, increased costs, or both? To figure this out I need to look at our company's financials from the past few years to spot trends.

3) If it's a world problem, we can see this by looking at market and competitor data.

Do you see where I'm going with this? You hypothesis is less on staking your claim on a random statement and more on stating what you need to know to figure it out. By the time you've found the data to say "I hypothesize that the profitability drop is due to revenue and client preference change" you're already at the end of the case giving your recommendation!

I think you need a specific example here not general rules. So, here goes.

First, unless you've been given some clear evidence, don't say "I hypothesize this is due to a R drop". What if the interviewer goes "why?"

Now, if our prompt is about a retailer in a middle America mall, ok, that hypothesis could be right (i.e. online threat, economic stagnating region, etc.). But, lacking that, your hypothesis should actually be more about "what do I need to find an answer".

So, you could say something like "to figure out what's happening here, I need to identify 1) If this is an "us" or the general world problem". If it's an "us" problem, what are we doing wrong? If it's a world problem, what is it specifically, and what can we do to fix it?

2) If it's an "us" problem, is this due to falling revenue, increased costs, or both? To figure this out I need to look at our company's financials from the past few years to spot trends.

3) If it's a world problem, we can see this by looking at market and competitor data.

Do you see where I'm going with this? You hypothesis is less on staking your claim on a random statement and more on stating what you need to know to figure it out. By the time you've found the data to say "I hypothesize that the profitability drop is due to revenue and client preference change" you're already at the end of the case giving your recommendation!

Book a coaching with Clara

100% Recommendation Rate

50 Meetings

11,411 Q&A Upvotes

USD 229 / Coaching

Hello!

Something that will help you is to envision the issue tree as a "way" to find the solution, that is at the end of this path. As the tree gets more and more ramificated, and before jumping into one of the branches, you need to totally discard the other one.

Hence, first, you will find yourself in the 1st crossroads > revenue or cost? Once the cost one is discarded, you continue to the revenue branch of this 1st crossroad, and forget about the other one. This way, you keep advancing, discarding.

Hope it helps!

Cheers,

Clara

Hello!

Something that will help you is to envision the issue tree as a "way" to find the solution, that is at the end of this path. As the tree gets more and more ramificated, and before jumping into one of the branches, you need to totally discard the other one.

Hence, first, you will find yourself in the 1st crossroads > revenue or cost? Once the cost one is discarded, you continue to the revenue branch of this 1st crossroad, and forget about the other one. This way, you keep advancing, discarding.

Hope it helps!

Cheers,

Clara

Book a coaching with Vlad

97% Recommendation Rate

404 Meetings

11,337 Q&A Upvotes

USD 239 / Coaching

Hi,

First of all - using the hypothesis is not mandatory. I would say - use the hypothesis if you are really good at solving the cases. If not - use the basic approach.

There are two ways to use the hypothesis:

First - presenting a structure using the hypothesis. For example, if you are having a PE (private equity) case, you should do the following:

1) Make classic structure (market, company, competitors, feasibility of exit)

2) Make subpoints (e.g. in market: size, growth rates, profitability, segmentation, etc)

3) Present your 1st level Hypothesis:

  • - "In order to understand whether we should invest in Company A, I would like to check that the Market is Attractive, the Company is Attractive, the competition is favorable and we have good opportunities for of exit"

4) Present the main 2nd level Hypothesis:

  • "In the market, I would like to make sure that the market is big enough and growing;
  • In the company I would like to find additional opportunities for growth;
  • In competition I would like to check that the market is fragmented enough;
  • Finally, I would like to check if we have potential buyers and can achieve desired exit multiples"

Another way to use hypothesis is using the hypothesis to prioritize your analysis:

1) Make a structure: "Problem in sales may be related to Sales Motivation, Sales Strategy, Sales Coverage, and Sales Process:

2) Prioritize a part of the structure based on your knowledge / common sense / available data: "Taking into account that motivation is the core problem of the sales organization, I would like to prioritize this part of the analysis"

Good luck!

Hi,

First of all - using the hypothesis is not mandatory. I would say - use the hypothesis if you are really good at solving the cases. If not - use the basic approach.

There are two ways to use the hypothesis:

First - presenting a structure using the hypothesis. For example, if you are having a PE (private equity) case, you should do the following:

1) Make classic structure (market, company, competitors, feasibility of exit)

2) Make subpoints (e.g. in market: size, growth rates, profitability, segmentation, etc)

3) Present your 1st level Hypothesis:

  • - "In order to understand whether we should invest in Company A, I would like to check that the Market is Attractive, the Company is Attractive, the competition is favorable and we have good opportunities for of exit"

4) Present the main 2nd level Hypothesis:

  • "In the market, I would like to make sure that the market is big enough and growing;
  • In the company I would like to find additional opportunities for growth;
  • In competition I would like to check that the market is fragmented enough;
  • Finally, I would like to check if we have potential buyers and can achieve desired exit multiples"

Another way to use hypothesis is using the hypothesis to prioritize your analysis:

1) Make a structure: "Problem in sales may be related to Sales Motivation, Sales Strategy, Sales Coverage, and Sales Process:

2) Prioritize a part of the structure based on your knowledge / common sense / available data: "Taking into account that motivation is the core problem of the sales organization, I would like to prioritize this part of the analysis"

Good luck!

Related case(s)

Hot Wheels

Solved 4.7k times
Hot Wheels Problem definition: Our client is Korean Car Parts (KCP), a multi-national original equipment manufacturer (OEM) of car parts based in Korea. They've recently seen a decline in profits and have brought us in to understand how to address this falling profitability.
4.6 5 280
| Rating: (4.6 / 5.0)

Problem definition: Our client is Korean Car Parts (KCP), a multi-national original equipment manufacturer (OEM) of car parts based in Korea. They've recently seen a decline in profits and have brought us in to understand how to address this falling profitability. Open whole case

Chinese Chess - Airline Business During COVID-19

Solved 3.3k times
Chinese Chess - Airline Business During COVID-19 Sky China, a government-backed Chinese airline, has recently seen profits plummet due to COVID-19. Profits are down 80% in the months of February and March, but are showing early signs of a rebound in April.  They've brought you in to first investigate what can be done immediatedly to prevent hemorrhaging cash and surive in the short-term. They are also looking to see how the current situation can be viewed as an opportunity, and what can be done to prepare for the future. 
4.3 5 101
| Rating: (4.3 / 5.0)

Sky China, a government-backed Chinese airline, has recently seen profits plummet due to COVID-19. Profits are down 80% in the months of February and March, but are showing early signs of a rebound in April. They've brought you in to first investigate what can be done immediatedly to prevent hemor ... Open whole case

Coronavirus Times - COVID-19 Brainteaser

Solved 2.9k times
Coronavirus Times - COVID-19 Brainteaser You and your family are faced with a challenging set of decisions. Due to coronavirus, your partner has taken a 20% paycut and you are worried you may lose your job. In addition, while daycare is still open, you are worried that sending your two children there will increase the risk of them bringing the virus back to your house, where your elderly grandparents are also staying. How would you go about thinking about this problem, and what would you recommend?
4.5 5 35
| Rating: (4.5 / 5.0)
Difficulty: Beginner | Style: Brain Teaser | Topics: Brain teaser

You and your family are faced with a challenging set of decisions. Due to coronavirus, your partner has taken a 20% paycut and you are worried you may lose your job. In addition, while daycare is still open, you are worried that sending your two children there will increase the risk of them bringing ... Open whole case

McKinsey Digital / BCG Platinion: Oil & Gas Upstream Technology

Solved 2.9k times
McKinsey Digital / BCG Platinion: Oil & Gas Upstream Technology [PLEASE NOTE: This is a technically difficult case and should only be completed by those coming in as a Technology specialist, i.e. recruiting for McKinsey Digital, BCG Platinion, etc.] Our client is a multinational oil and gas company. While they are vertically integrated and have upstream, midstream, and downstream divisions, they have recently been experiencing competitivity issues in the upstream gas division, which brings in $1B in profits annually. Our client’s upstream division has offices in Australia and Indonesia. Their work is highly dependent on their IT systems, as they have to constantly monitor wells and pipes (pressure, hydrocarbon count, fluid makeup, etc.) The upstream division has two large legacy IT systems that are primarily used for downstream operations but have been modified for upstream purposes. These systems are managed by a central team in the US which is responsible for all IT issues across the business. They triage issues/enhancements and then manage development teams in India and Finland who complete the work.
4.5 5 58
| Rating: (4.5 / 5.0)

[PLEASE NOTE: This is a technically difficult case and should only be completed by those coming in as a Technology specialist, i.e. recruiting for McKinsey Digital, BCG Platinion, etc.] Our client is a multinational oil and gas company. While they are vertically integrated and have upstream, midstr ... Open whole case

YodaPhone

Solved 2.2k times
YodaPhone Our client is Yoda's Phones, a national telecommunications company. They have embarked on a three-year, multi-million dollar digitization program. Unfortunately, two years into the program, they realize they are significantly behind schedule and over budget. You have been brought in to right the ship and ensure the digitization program is delivered as planned.
4.5 5 59
| Rating: (4.5 / 5.0)

Our client is Yoda's Phones, a national telecommunications company. They have embarked on a three-year, multi-million dollar digitization program. Unfortunately, two years into the program, they realize they are significantly behind schedule and over budget. You have been brought in to right the sh ... Open whole case