Cookie and Privacy Settings

This website uses cookies to enable essential functions like the user login and sessions. We also use cookies and third-party tools to improve your surfing experience on preplounge.com. You can choose to activate only essential cookies or all cookies. You can always change your preference in the cookie and privacy settings. This link can also be found in the footer of the site. If you need more information, please visit our privacy policy.

Data processing in the USA: By clicking on "I accept", you also consent, in accordance with article 49 paragraph 1 sentence 1 lit. GDPR, to your data being processed in the USA (by Google LLC, Facebook Inc., LinkedIn Inc., Stripe, Paypal).

Manage settings individually I accept
expert
Expert with best answer

Abdelrahman

100% Recommendation Rate

1 Meetings

14 Q&A Upvotes

USD 149 / Coaching

1

How to Structure this case ?

Curious how you would structure that case taken from Case In Point. I am not fan of Cosentino structure on that one.

Our client is a global automaker headquartered in Detroit. Its motor parts division, with 20% industry market share, carries almost 500,000 parts, options, and accessories for vehicle customisation. The client has not been profitable for several years and the CEO suspects that the company's high degree of ventical integration is hurting it. The client makes about 80% of its own parts, compared with 40% at its primary competitors. The CEO has asked for our help. How would you approach this issue ?

Curious how you would structure that case taken from Case In Point. I am not fan of Cosentino structure on that one.

Our client is a global automaker headquartered in Detroit. Its motor parts division, with 20% industry market share, carries almost 500,000 parts, options, and accessories for vehicle customisation. The client has not been profitable for several years and the CEO suspects that the company's high degree of ventical integration is hurting it. The client makes about 80% of its own parts, compared with 40% at its primary competitors. The CEO has asked for our help. How would you approach this issue ?

1 answer

  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Best Answer
Book a coaching with Abdelrahman

100% Recommendation Rate

1 Meetings

14 Q&A Upvotes

USD 149 / Coaching

Hi Raf,

Even though I do like the way it was structured in Case in Point, I think it just assumes that the client hypothesis is correct from the beginning (assuming that it is a cost cutting case), while it might not be a cost issue, but rather a revenue one. Therefore, I would still structure it like any other profitability case: following the revenue and cost framework, but since the client already has a hypothesis on cost (because of vertical integration), I would investigate the cost branch first. Looking at the cost, I would look at fixed and variable and then I would look at trends (how did cost change over time) and I would compare this info to what our competitors are doing and why.

Once we do realize that it is a cost problem (i.e. our profits are down because the costs are higher than competitors), then the framework in Case in Point works quite well considering strategic value, alternatives, and potential exits if necessary.

I hope this helps.

Best, Abdelrahman

Hi Raf,

Even though I do like the way it was structured in Case in Point, I think it just assumes that the client hypothesis is correct from the beginning (assuming that it is a cost cutting case), while it might not be a cost issue, but rather a revenue one. Therefore, I would still structure it like any other profitability case: following the revenue and cost framework, but since the client already has a hypothesis on cost (because of vertical integration), I would investigate the cost branch first. Looking at the cost, I would look at fixed and variable and then I would look at trends (how did cost change over time) and I would compare this info to what our competitors are doing and why.

Once we do realize that it is a cost problem (i.e. our profits are down because the costs are higher than competitors), then the framework in Case in Point works quite well considering strategic value, alternatives, and potential exits if necessary.

I hope this helps.

Best, Abdelrahman

Hi Abdelrahman, My confusion comes from the fact that it's a sub department within a bigger company. The mother company profits are suffering because of a potential non optimal vertical integration. How are you going to run a profitability framework on this one ? Would you do it on the mother company ? If yes, there would be a lot of factors that would not lead to solve the case. If you do it on the department, you'll miss the big picture. — raf on Aug 08, 2020

I think this is a fair point. I see two solutions to this: 1- that could probably be asked as a clarifying question to the interviewer at the beginning of the case in real life. 2- You run the framework on the big company, but you start with revenue first and analyze if there were any changes relative to competitors. That way you eliminate the possibility of the problem being revenue-driven. I hope this helps! — Abdelrahman on Aug 11, 2020

Related case(s)

MBB Final Round Case - Smart Education

Solved 15.2k times
MBB Final Round Case - Smart Education Our client is SmartBridge, a nonprofit educational institution offering face-to-face tutoring services. The client operates in the US. The mission of SmartBridge is to help as many students as possible to complete studies and prevent that they drop from the school system, in particular in disadvantaged areas. The client is considering starting operations for its services in the Chicago area. They hired us to understand if that makes sense. Due to the nonprofit regulation, SmartBridge should operate on its own in the market, without any partnership. How would you help our client?
4.6 5 525
| Rating: (4.6 / 5.0)

Our client is SmartBridge, a nonprofit educational institution offering face-to-face tutoring services. The client operates in the US. The mission of SmartBridge is to help as many students as possible to complete studies and prevent that they drop from the school system, in particular in disadvant ... Open whole case