Get Active in Our Amazing Community of Over 451,000 Peers!

Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Case Partners to connect and practice with!

How to structure growth strategy cases?

growth strategy MBB
Edited on Jul 20, 2021
3 Answers
1.6 k Views
Anonymous A asked on Jul 19, 2021

What is the best framework to use to structure ambiguos growth strategy cases - e.g. client wants to double revenue in 5 years

Would the following structure be ok:

1. Shortlist ideas e.g. optimise current revenue streams, launch new revenue streamts

2. Evaluate revenue impact of ideas

3. Prioritse

Thank you

Overview of answers

Upvotes
  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Best answer
Ian
Expert
Content Creator
updated an answer on Jul 20, 2021
#1 BCG coach | MBB | Tier 2 | Digital, Tech, Platinion | 100% personal success rate (8/8) | 95% candidate success rate

Hi there,

This is completely wrong - please never setup a framework like this.

Sorry to be so direct, but this is literally the essence of every single project/problem/case. Of course we have to identify ideas, figure out which ones are best, and prioritize. This is not what they're paying you millions of dollars to do as a consultant!

Rather, you have to break down how you are going to address the issue (i.e. how do you structure the ideas themselves).

How to Structure In General

 I'm going to take a step back and answer the question you're really asking: How do I use frameworks in a case?

If there's anything to remember in this process, is that cases don't exist just because. They have come about because of a real need to simulate the world you will be in when you are hopefully hired. As such, remember that they are a simplified version of what we do, and they test you in those areas.

As such, remember that a framework is a guide, not a mandate. In the real-world, we do not go into a client and say "right, we have a framework that says we need to look at x, y, and z and that's exactly what we're going to do". Rather, we come in with a view, a hypothesis, a plan of attack. The moment this view is created, it's wrong! Same with your framework. The point is that it gives us and you a starting point. We can say "right, part 1 of framework is around this. Let's dig around and see if it helps us get to the answer". If it does, great, we go further (but specific elements of it will certainly be wrong). If it doesn't, we move on.

So, in summary, learn your frameworks, use the ones you like, add/remove to them if the specific case calls for it, and always be prepared to be wrong. Focus rather on having a view, refering back to the initial view to see what is still there and where you need to dive into next to solve the problem.

Structuring Growth Cases

In general, when looking for growth, I like the following general framework:

1) Improve existing business (i.e. look at our current products/customer segments to see where we can earn more $...higher q or p)

2) Grow our business through expansion of current products - this can be done either organically or inorganically

3) Grow our business by launching our existing products to new markets (i.e. new geographies, new customer segments, etc)

Now, how to talk about this in terms of structure, tailoring to the case, and the deeper level examples incl the why + how? I'll leave that to you to work through :P

(edited)

Was this answer helpful?
Ken
Expert
updated an answer on Jul 19, 2021
Ex-McKinsey final round interviewer | Executive Coach

I would argue your suggestion is more of a process than a structure that gets to the "issue" of the problem which is to "double revenues in 5 years". It's also worth noting there is no "best" way to structure a growth strategy where it's really dependent on the client context. The context matters as that is what helps you with a hypothesis on how you would further structure the sub-buckets. Based on the absence of context, I personally would keep it simple and start my structure based on existing vs. new revenue streams.

Existing could be segemented by business unit, geography, customer, etc. where you would want to break down the different ways you could potentially grow revenue. Say your cllient was P&G, you break down existing revenues in terms of the different product lines. Then the next level would be to take a specific product line, e.g., Pampers, which you could breakdown further into, new product line, more marketing, pricing, cross-selling more baby related prodcuts, new markets, etc. 

On the flip side, new revenue streams could be new business areas. Taking the example of P&G again, it could be consumer health, or a new geography, or new channel, etc. etc. I would discuss this in the context of market opportunities, competive landscape, our internal capabilities and synergies, etc. 

Hope this helps!

(edited)

Was this answer helpful?
Adi
Expert
Content Creator
replied on Jul 19, 2021
Accenture, Deloitte | Precision Case Prep | Experienced Interviewer & Career Coach | 15 years professional experience

Hi,

There really is no point writing long aswers/essays when answers already exist in the Q&A forum. It takes 10 seconds to search. Check out below for some brilliant answers. Take the tips and experiment with your own structure. There is no one size fits all growth strategy structure.

  • https://www.preplounge.com/en/consulting-forum/assessing-different-options-for-a-growth-strategy-case-1949
  • https://www.preplounge.com/en/consulting-forum/structure-for-growth-strategy-cases-2582
  • https://www.preplounge.com/en/consulting-forum/grwoth-strategy-4071
  • https://www.preplounge.com/en/consulting-forum/growth-strategy-preplounge-coaches-war-10814
Was this answer helpful?
Ian gave the best answer

Ian

Content Creator
#1 BCG coach | MBB | Tier 2 | Digital, Tech, Platinion | 100% personal success rate (8/8) | 95% candidate success rate
1,096
Meetings
77,376
Q&A Upvotes
232
Awards
5.0
151 Reviews