Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Case Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview

Framework-Confusion: Market Entry, etc.

Hi!

I have questions with regard to frameworks (I'm following Victor Cheng's profitability and business situations, realizing they can be adapted to the individual situation of course, if anyone would have time to answer/discuss, sorry in advance if it's long):

1.In a "what factors should client X consider when entering the market", I often start off by mentioning 1. i.Customers, ii.Product, iii.Company, iv.Competition. I often include the market-sizing as a first point under i.Customers since it seems most important to consider the market size and growth first (althogh I'm unsure whether this could perhaps be done as a seperate heading, but minor detail).. Questions that come to mind:

--Sometimes it feels more natural to say I'd like to look at potential Revenues and Costs first. But that would effectively be a mix of frameworks and I'd like to be consistent. When using the business situations, Revenues would be decided by i. Customers/Market Size and iv. Competition (since depending on nr of competitors, I would know our market share of total market and thus Revenue). Costs, in turn, would be decided under iii. Company. Especially financial feasability and investment costs would be determined here, which could also be a starting point. This feels like jumping around a lot in the framework to explain this to the interviewer though! Anyone else has the same "issue" and perhaps advice on how to do it? I could stick with this approach, but sometimes it feels very odd.

2. When given a Profitability-case, of course there are more external variables to consider, beyond the Profitability-framework. How do you guys do it here in the beginning; do you simply start with Profitability with no mention that you will later switch framework to business situations if needed? (Victor gave no initial mention that he would look at additional factors in one of his LOMS, but to me, it could appear to the interviewer that one forgot..) Perhaps one could say something like: "I'll start off with Revenues minus Costs, this is what I want to know within each, etc, etc. [give specific mention, e.g. segment break-down, over time, industry wide or not..], then I might switch to look at i. Customers, ii.Product, iii.Company iv.Competitors to analyze more in depth". That feels a bit awkward too though! In addition, you have effectively already touched upon the customers and competition then in the profitability.

Again, I realize there's no "right" answer here and that it depends on the situation. Mainly looking to see if anyone else is confused and whether there's any relief :) Many thank you // Xie xie // Danke schön

Feel free to answer here or PM me for further discussion

1 Answer
5.9k Views
8
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Deleted
Coach
on Jan 13, 2017
| Ex-BCG Project lead | Ex-Partners in Performance Manager | Former Case coach at Stanford

Hi!

I had the similar thoughts and I resolved them for myself through hypothesis-driven approach and more tailored frameworks (not those of Victor Cheng).

1. For market entry

I say, I’d like to analyze 4 things:

  1. Market (size, growth, segments, competition)
  2. Financials (investment cost for entry, revenue, cost, metrics (ROI, …))
  3. Way of entry (JV, green field, M&A,…)
  4. Capabilities (do we need new capacity, do we need to build new competences,…)

Then I say let’s prioritize. I wanna test the hypothesis that this is a good idea to enter. So, I start with market – if it is good (size, competition,…), I say ok, let’s move to financials, if not – let’s stop here and reject hypothesis. If Financials are ok, so let’s see how we can enter it and so on.

I give this reasoning when I present framework at the early beginning and only then start asking for data about the market.

2. For profitability

I say, I’d like to analyze 3 things:

  1. Revenues (market size, trends, competition, customer segments)
  2. Products (products themselves, pricing, features)
  3. Costs (FCs, VCs, benchmarking)

Then I say that 1) and 2) are mostly Volume and Price and I mark them this way when I present the framework.

Hope it makes sense.

on Jan 16, 2017
Thank you! It really helps!!! Great new way of thinking and makes more sense. Now however I feel like Chengs frameworks are so engrained into my mind, so Ill work with them I think but just make everything very clear . Should be fine hopefully :)
on Oct 15, 2019
I wonder in your market entry framework, the market part, shall we move " segment" in the clarification at the beginning or at the start of the market part?
on Oct 15, 2019
cos if there is segment, then the following analysis should follow the segment instead of the whole market. that may influence the framework. like victor cheng's LOM case "moving"
Similar Questions
Consulting
Case on Framework Structure - Market Entry
on May 09, 2024
Global
5 Answers
1.1k Views
Top answer by
ex-BCG Consultant & Interviewer | +150 interviews | Tackle any case w/o memorizing frameworks | Harvard MBA
44
5 Answers
1.1k Views
+2
Consulting
CDD/Private Equity Interviews
on Jul 13, 2024
Global
2 Answers
8.9k Views
Top answer by
Bain | EY-Parthenon | Private Equity | Market Estimates | Fit Interview
471
2 Answers
8.9k Views
Consulting
Profitability framework
on Feb 29, 2024
Global
4 Answers
800+ Views
Top answer by
#1 BCG coach | MBB | Tier 2 | Digital, Tech, Platinion | 100% personal success rate (8/8) | 95% candidate success rate
26
4 Answers
800+ Views
+1
How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely
You are a true consultant! Thank you for consulting us on how to make PrepLounge even better!