Exhibit interpretation approach

Anonymous,

Good question - I think a lot of people try too hard to impress the interviewer here and therefore make mistakes.

You are being tested for three things:
1) Can you read a chart?
2) Can you draw information that is relevant to the case
3) Can you use the information to suggest various ideas (depends on the question)

You'll notice that as you move from #1-3, you move from a more closed question to a more open-ended question.

Therefore - this is the key:
1) Start with the simple task of demonstrating you know how to read a chart.
2) Then draw out some information that you can discuss with the interviewer
3) Only then should you pause and try to come up with a structured set of creative ideas

If you go straight to #3, you are risking going down the wrong path and failing to demonstrate #1. Also, would you ever go straight to #3 in a real-life consulting engagement? Align with the team on #1 first! Just don't spend too much time on #1.

Finally, don't forget the question that was asked! Sometimes the interviewer will say, "The client brought you this data. What does this imply?" in which case it's much more open ended. But sometimes the interviewer will make it easier for you by asking, "What does this chart tell you about the proposed strategy?"

What do you think?

(edited)

It is always best practice to ask for time to look at new information. No one can process information in real time

• Take a minute or so to look at the data.
• Reflect on what it is saying - what are the axes, what is the data telling you, what are the main trends and most importantly what does it mean oveall (e.g., overall profits are increasing year on year)
• Contextualize it to the case/question - how does this fit into the case - especially in the current question and even with regards to previous information
• What is the 'so what' or the implication of it with regards to the question - this is where you go beyond what the chart tells you and think about implications of what it tells you (and this is the part that makes you a strong candidate)

All the best,

Udayan

Dear A,

For me your second option looks better, when you first look at the exhibit and first read the name and the numbers, try to find the correlation and think how it might be connected to the situation. Only after that you can come up with some conclusions of how you can use it further.

Best,
André

Hi Anonymous,

Please don't waste your interviewer's time by stating the obvious for more than a few seconds in the beginning. You can use that tactically to have a few seconds to orient yourself on the chart, but nothing more than that - I trust that you can read so no need to prove it in that moment.

The key is "beyond the obvious". Interpreting a graph means deriving appropriate insights given the context of the case at hand. This is where to focus on - as simple as that.

Hope that helps - if so, please be so kind and give it a thumbs-up with the green upvote button below!

Robert

Hi there,

The 2nd option looks best, but ideally it takes you more like 15 seconds not a minute!

In terms of being able to interpret charts/graphs effectively

1) Read the title - and understand it

2) Read the legends - and understand them

3) Remind yourself of the objective / hypothesis in the case, to see where this might fit

4) Find the differences - where does the line graph plummet or spike? Which column is a lot smaller or bigger than the others? Where does change occur? The differences are what matter

5) Talk outloud while interpreting - first, it helps you think and process your thoughts, second, it lets the interviewer provide guidance and course correct if needed.

Best Rote Practice

Rocket Blocks: https://www.rocketblocks.me/

Best Practice Strategy

1) Read the Economist (especially the daily graph and Financial Time frequently

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/05/29/america-first

2) Ask case partners to focus particularly on your chart-reading skills (i.e. by providing you with cases with many charts) - Bain and Deloitte cases tend to be chart heavy