(edited)
Get Active in Our Amazing Community of Over 451,000 Peers!
Clarifying question for pricing case
Overview of answers
Hi there,
You're starting to get into "solve the case for me" territory. You can absolutely ask how this technology/innovation is going to improve the product (i.e. across what traits, etc.). From there, yes you are expected to think through how those improvements/innovations will actually result in new benefits.
In regards to saving time, it could do both right...if I redesign a product to save time in terms of aging my wine, well, that means I can produce more wine and make more money. However, if it saves time and let's me bottle each wine more quickly, that allows me to cut labor costs (I'm a winery meaning my land/# of grapes is mostly fixed).
Think through these problems critically...that is always the expectation! :)
Hi there,
You can definitely ask for clarification on the benefits as clarifying question if that’s not clear. However:
- I would present the question with a hypothesis on where you would expect the savings (eg “Since you told me savings would be related to XYZ, I would expect this would result in ABC, do we have any information whether that’s correct”)
- I would move to quantify the savings when you solve the case (after you presented the structure), not as clarifying questions
Best,
Francesco
You should be in the drivers seat and validate your thinking/hypothesis with the interviewer.