Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Interview Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview

Capturing Market Share with Price Wars

Does capturing market share from competitors by lowering prices (i.e. price wars) ever work? Will it ever lead to anything more than bleeding profitability our of the market? What industries will this work best for? Experienced consultants, please share your thoughts and real life examples. Thanks.

7
2.0k
8
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Ian
Coach
edited on Feb 26, 2021
Top US BCG / MBB Coach - 5,000 sessions |Tech, Platinion, Big 4 | 9/9 personal interviews passed | 95% candidate success

Hi there,

Be careful with wording here. Price wars involve lowering prices, but lowering prices don't necessarily involve price wars.

I can lower my price without my competitor following suit.

As such, if you're lowering price to capture market share, always you make sure you analyze/understand the following:

  1. How many more additional units will get?
    1. What is the profit and market share result...does it actually result in a net gain?
      1. This is essentially price elasticity analysis
  2. Will our competition respond?
    1. If yes, how, and will that negate our gains
      1. To determine: analyze their current profit margins, cost structure, behavior, etc. to figure out if they are likely to cut costs (i.e. do they have that trait and can they even physically accomplish this)

Note: plenty of monopolies like Amazon, Facebook, Apple do this regularly. I.e. cut prices, snuff out competition (and/or gain massive economics of scale), then bring prices back up.

Saudi Arabia also did this in 2018/19 (I think these years) to make American shale bleed.

Lots of examples of price cutting being an effective tactic...but it's not a "light" decision to make :)

on Feb 27, 2021
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success: ➡ interviewoffers.com | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching

Hi there,

I agree with Sidi that there are two main advantages for a price war:

  1. Kick a competitor out of the market
  2. Rise barriers to entry (if you do this before a competitor enters, it may discourage them from doing so)

The first practice is illegal if you price below your costs just to kick a competitor out (predatory pricing), but not very easy to prove in court.

You may also decrease prices and not lead to a price war as mentioned by Ian. This is usually done to increase market share, hoping competitors won’t copy the tactic.

Best,

Francesco

Clara
Coach
on Feb 28, 2021
McKinsey | Awarded professor at Master in Management @ IE | MBA at MIT |+180 students coached | Integrated FIT Guide aut

Hello!

It does, and it´s used when you think that you are going to be able to mantein this long term. 

However, at least theorically, this only benefits in the long term the clients, not the companies, who would lower more and more the prices until it becomes unprofitable for one of them. 

Hope it helps!

Cheers, 

Clara

Deleted user
on Feb 27, 2021

Of course it does, and there are real-life examples for this. A very prominent one is Didi that killed Uber in the Chinese market around 2014-16 if I remember correctly. The two were fighting a brutal war with offering basically free rides (I remember taking 30min ride half way through Beijing for around 3RMB, and getting a bottle of water worth 2RMB from the driver). The result was that Uber couldn't sustain bleeding cash and eventually sold their China businesss to Didi.

9
Sidi
Coach
on Feb 26, 2021
McKinsey Senior EM & BCG Consultant | Interviewer at McK & BCG for 7 years | Coached 400+ candidates secure MBB offers

Price wars are obviously bad for the supply side of the market. Unless you have a structural cost advantage which allows you to push competitors out of the market by undercotting their marginal cost with your prices, and then idealy errecting entry barriers to the market before raising prices again (thereby behaving like a protected monopolist). But this is a very theoretical construct and there are few examples in real life that would come to mind.

Cheers, Sidi

Gaurav
Coach
on Feb 28, 2021
#1 MBB Coach(Placed 750+ in MBBs & 1250+ in Tier2)| The Only 360° coach(Ex-McKinsey+Certified Coach+Active recruiter)

Hi there, 

yes, for example - big companies which make it really hard for new companies to compete / even enter the market.

GB

on Feb 27, 2021
McKinsey | NASA | top 10 FT MBA professor for consulting interviews | 6+ years of coaching

Hi, I confirm it's used to keep new entrants out of the market or to gin MS in order to create a large customer base to upsell services or ancillary products

Best,
Antonello 

Similar Questions
Consulting
How to choose a Coach + best frequency for maximum growth?
on Apr 26, 2025
Global
10
400+
Top answer by
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 8+ years consulting, 8+ years coaching and 7+ years interviewing experience
14
10 Answers
400+ Views
+7
Consulting
Organic vs inorganic growth
on May 02, 2025
Global
6
100+
Top answer by
Andreas
Coach
BCG Principal, 150+ BCG interviews (incl. final rounds), Post-MBA offers from All Big 3 / MBB
9
6 Answers
100+ Views
+3
Consulting
How should I explain a change in course at university? Will it be asked of me?
on Apr 14, 2025
Global
10
3.7k
Top answer by
Alessa
Coach
xMcKinsey & Company | xBCG | +200 individual & group coachings | feel free to schedule a 15 min intro call for free
81
10 Answers
3.7k Views
+7
How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely
Thanks for your feedback! Your opinion helps us make PrepLounge even better.