Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Interview Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview
Question merged
This question is read-only because it has been merged with
Case in point vs Case interview secrets(Victor Cheng)

Business framework by Victor Cheng

Hello, could anyone help me to understand more about the business framework mentioned in Victor Cheng's book? Is this framework more about exploring different dimensions of the problem, or could it be used to verify the hypothesis?

 In the first approach, I ask questions categorized by client / company / competition / product, to try to understand the business issue in detail.

In the second approach, after confirming cost stayed the same, I could say the issue might be driven by internal (company/product) or external (client / competition) factors. The next step is to verify the hypothesis that this is an internal issue, and I branch out the external factors. Lastly, I verify the hypothesis that this is a company problem, and delete the product branch. In the end, I could prove that this is a company related problem, and focus on this area to find a root cause of profitability drop.  

Which approach is the correct way to use the framework? Thanks!

7
1.9k
0
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Luca
Coach
on Feb 26, 2020
BCG |NASA | SDA Bocconi & Cattolica partner | GMAT expert 780/800 score | 200+ students coached

I would suggest the second one. ANyway, try to build your own frameworks and not be stucked to the ones proposed by casebooks.

Best,
Luca

Ian
Coach
on Feb 23, 2020
Top US BCG / MBB Coach - 5,000 sessions |Tech, Platinion, Big 4 | 9/9 personal interviews passed | 95% candidate success

Is this framework more about exploring different dimensions of the problem, or could it be used to verify the hypothesis?

This is the exact same question. This is the entire point of a framework...to develop and confirm your hypothesis/es on the problem!

Which approach is the correct way to use the framework?

It depends on the context of your case. However, in general, you are asking questions that get you closer and closer to an answer or an understanding of the world. You're narrowing down (or moving towards) a clearer view of the things that matter for your problem.

Vlad
Coach
on Feb 24, 2020
McKinsey / Accenture Alum / Got all BIG3 offers / Harvard Business School

Hi,

First of all - using hypotheses is not mandatory. I would say - use the hypothesis if you are really good at solving the cases. If not - use the basic approach

There are two ways to use the hypothesis 

First - presenting a structure using the hypothesis. For example, if you are having a PE (private equity) case, you should do the following:

1) Make classic structure (market, company, competitors, feasibility of exit)

2) Make subpoints (e.g. in market: size, growth rates, profitability, segmentation, etc) 

3) Present your 1st level Hypothesis:

  • - "In order to understand whether we should invest in Company A, I would like to check that the Market is Attractive, the Company is Attractive, the competition is favorable and we have good opportunities for of exit"

4) Present the main 2nd level Hypothesis:

  • "In the market, I would like to make sure that the market is big enough and growing;
  • In the company I would like to find additional opportunities for growth;
  • In competition I would like to check that the market is fragmented enough;
  • Finally, I would like to check if we have potential buyers and can achieve desired exit multiples"

Another way to use hypothesis is using the hypothesis to prioritize your analysis:

1) Make a structure: "Problem in sales may be related to Sales Motivation, Sales Strategy, Sales Coverage, and Sales Process:

2) Prioritize a part of the structure based on your knowledge / common sense / available data: "Taking into account that motivation is the core problem of the sales organization, I would like to prioritize this part of the analysis" 

Good luck!

on Feb 24, 2020
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success: ➡ interviewoffers.com | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching

Hi Anonymous,

your second option (verify the hypothesis) would be better. However, I would stay away from the Victor Cheng structure of company-client-competition-product – this framework is completely outdated and useless for many cases (eg operations).

Best,

Francesco

Clara
Coach
on Feb 24, 2020
McKinsey | Awarded professor at Master in Management @ IE | MBA at MIT |+180 students coached | Integrated FIT Guide aut

Hello!

+1 to Francesco, don´t make the mistake at looking at this structures and thinking they would provide you a holistic toolkit, since they won´t. 

Is good a pre-read to get up to speed tough. 

Hope it helps!

Cheers, 

Clara

on Feb 25, 2020
McKinsey | NASA | top 10 FT MBA professor for consulting interviews | 6+ years of coaching

I confirm the second approach is better.

Best,
Antonello

Emily
Coach
on Jun 30, 2020
9 years in MBB Southeast Asia & China| 8 years as MBB interviewer | Free intro call

Hi,
Agree with Ian that "exploring different dimension of the problem" and "verify hypothesis" is the same thing. It is both about how you break down a big problem into small pieces and test where the issue lies.
E.g. the problem could be "is it a good idea to enter market A", you can totally rephrase that to hypothesis of "Enter market A is a good idea" or "A bad idea". Then you would look into the same 4 dimension regardless how you state the problem/hypothesis. In the hypothesis approach, you can just rephrase the dimensions, e.g. "I would like to look into the company capability, to see if they have the right capability to enter; once we have that understanding we can prove or disprove the hypothesis from a capability point of view"...Same for other dimension.
It is the same thing, just how you phrase it. But remember to customise the framework according to the specific case context.

Best,

Emily

Similar Questions
Consulting
Just did the Mckinsey Solve Game (January 2025) - got some questions/insights
on Apr 24, 2025
Global
5
3.2k
Top answer by
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 8+ years consulting, 8+ years coaching and 7+ years interviewing experience
35
5 Answers
3.2k Views
+2
Consulting
Has anyone tried any of the AI Interview Tools for MBB before?
on Mar 25, 2025
Global
10
13.4k
Top answer by
Iman
Coach
Systemiq | Ex-BCG | 10 years experience with 8+ specialising in sustainability | Free Intro | Ex-PrepLounge candidate
348
10 Answers
13.4k Views
+7
Consulting
Employment Gap on Resume and How to talk about it during Interview
on Apr 14, 2025
Global
9
7.7k
Top answer by
Ariadna
Coach
BCG | Project Leader and Experienced Interviewer | MBA at London Business School
110
9 Answers
7.7k Views
+6
How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely
Thanks for your feedback! Your opinion helps us make PrepLounge even better.