Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Interview Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview
Anonymous A
on Mar 04, 2020
Global
Question about

What is the reasoning behind choosing that there won't be synergies savings related to travel, real estate/staff costs?

1
2.5k
16
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Robert
Coach
on Mar 05, 2020
McKinsey offers w/o final round interviews - 100% risk-free - 10+ years MBB coaching experience - Multiple book author

Hi Anonymous,

Could you please be so kind and explain your question a bit more in detail, please? Honestly I did not get the question from the headline only.

Thanks for your help!

Robert

Anonymous
on Mar 05, 2020
Hello Robert, no problem at all! So, what I don't get is how can we decide that we won't have any costs savings from the travels/staff/real estate? For example, in the case we have the following conclusion: Staff costs (excludes HQ) Eligible for synergies: Rather not. How is it reached? Thank you in advance, I hope I have been clearer!
on May 05, 2020
Good point, would also interest me!
Similar Questions
Consulting
Question about
Why 20% for IT cost and 30% for Headquarter cost
on Jan 05, 2021
Global
3
2.4k
Top answer by
Clara
Coach
McKinsey | Awarded professor at Master in Management @ IE | MBA at MIT |+180 students coached | Integrated FIT Guide aut
26
3 Answers
2.4k Views