Consulting Consulting
Back to overview

Mckinsey PEI

Hi! I wanted to get your advice on preparing my PEI stories for an application to Orphoz, Mckinsey.

I have around 3.5 years of experience in management consulting and am preparing one main story for each of the four PEI dimensions: Connection, Leadership, Drive, and Growth.

For Connection, I've already prepared a story based on a recent professional experience. However, I'm wondering how much I should prioritize professional experiences versus academic and extracurricular ones for the other dimensions.

I actually passed McKinsey's generalist screening process around four years ago, when I was still a student. At the time, I had a strong academic profile, with challenging projects at a top business school, as well as substantial extracurricular involvement, particularly in competitive sports.

For example, for Leadership, I could use a master's project in which I led a diverse group of students in a major company-sponsored competition. For Drive, I could draw on my experience as a professional athlete and the ambitious goals I pursued alongside my studies.

Given that I am applying now as an experienced hire, would it still make sense to use some of these earlier academic or extracurricular experiences for my PEI stories, or should I prioritize professional examples across all four dimensions?

I'd really appreciate your perspective on how best to strike the right balance!

5
8
< 100
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Profile picture of Carlos
Carlos
Coach
3 days ago
Free 15 min intro | Engagement manager | 5+ yrs interviewing candidates | 90%+ success rate

Hi! I would not force all four PEI stories to be professional, even as an experienced hire.

With 3.5 years of consulting experience, I would expect your overall story set to reflect who you are professionally today, so professional examples should probably be the default. But that does not mean every single story needs to come from work.

For me, the key question is: which story gives you the strongest evidence for that specific dimension?

A few practical rules I would use:

  • Story strength matters more than story category. A strong academic or extracurricular example is better than a weak professional one.
  • Recency still matters. The older the story is, the more distinctive and powerful it should be to justify using it.
  • Your full set should still feel senior enough. If 3 out of 4 stories come from university despite several years of consulting experience, that could feel slightly unbalanced.
  • Different contexts can actually help. A mix of consulting, university leadership and competitive sport can make your profile more memorable than four very similar client-project stories.

In your case, I could absolutely see the professional athlete example working well for Drive if it clearly shows ambitious goals, discipline, setbacks and persistence. Similarly, your master’s project could still work for Leadership if you genuinely led the team through difficult decisions, conflicting views or pressure.

I would probably aim for something like:
2–3 professional stories + 1–2 older but highly distinctive stories, rather than trying to make all four professional at any cost.

One more point: I would also prepare at least one backup story per dimension. In PEI, the exact wording of the question can make one example much easier to use than another.

So overall, professional examples should become the default, not an absolute rule.

Best,

Carlos

Profile picture of Ian
Ian
Coach
2 days ago
Ex-BCG | NYU Stern | MBB, Tech, & Strategy Coach | 5,000+ Sessions | 500+ Offers | 1,000+ Candidates | 100+ Countries

Hi there,

Both of those stories seem like excellent ones! There is certainly no points off for them being 4-5 years old. I would absolutely proceed with them!

The big caveat is that I haven't heard the stories! Pick the ones that best demonstrate the dimension, your personal actions, the challenge and the impact. Don't choose a professional story just because it feels more applicable to consulting.

Also, prepare backups rather than relying on exactly one story per dimension.

For the PEI more broadly, take a look at my Behavioral Interview Course.

Profile picture of Ashwin
Ashwin
Coach
2 days ago
Ex-Bain | Help 500+ aspirants secure MBB offers

I would keep most of your set professional, though not necessarily all four. After three and a half years in consulting, the interviewer will expect recent work to carry most of the evidence, and if your go-to stories all predate it, that invites the question of what you have done since. One older story that is clearly your best for its dimension is fine. Three out of four would worry me.

Of your two options, I would keep the athletics story for Drive. That dimension is about pushing through setbacks toward a goal you set yourself, and a professional sports career can show it vividly. The master's project is the weaker choice for Leadership. As a consultant you have likely had to move clients or colleagues who did not report to you, which is what an experienced-hire interviewer will look for.

McKinsey's guidance suggests two examples per area, so build a recent work backup for Drive too. I would not lean on having passed screening four years ago, and since Orphoz may run its own process, confirm the format with your recruiter.

Profile picture of Shayan
Shayan
Coach
22 hrs ago
Ex-McKinsey and Kearney consultant | Cambridge MBA Master structure and communication with me

Hi, thanks for sharing so much context. Having passed the screening before and being a competitive athlete helps you, and you’re asking the right question.

My advice is to make professional stories your default for two out of four dimensions. Use an academic or sports story for the other two where it is clearly your strongest example

Why professional first

The expectations are different now. Four years ago you were judged as a student. Now you’re judged as someone with 3.5 years of consulting, so the interviewer is asking whether you already behave like a consultant here.

Depth. The PEI is one story probed for 20 to 30 minutes. A client situation with real stakes gives the interviewer more to dig into than a student competition, where it’s harder to show tension and trade-offs.

Recency. If every story comes from university, the interviewer may wonder what happened in the last three years.

Dimension by dimension

  • DimensionMy advice
    LeadershipUse a professional story, such as leading a workstream, guiding a junior colleague or handling a difficult client conversation. After 3.5 years you’ll have good material, and I would leave the master’s project aside
    GrowthThis has to be recent and professional. Interviewers want feedback you received, what you changed and how it showed later. An old story suggests the growth stopped
    ConnectionYou’ve done this already. Just check it doesn’t overlap with the other three
    DriveThis is where your athlete story can work. Sustained, ambitious goals with real sacrifice are hard to match at work. I’d still test it against your best professional option first

The test for every story

Were you personally driving it? Say “I”, not “we”.

Was there a real obstacle, ideally with resistance from someone?

Can you describe your own actions in detail?

Was there a clear result and something you learned?

Could you talk about it for 20 minutes without running dry?

If a university story fails one of these, the professional one is the safer choice.

What I would do

Go through your last 3.5 years of projects and match the best story to each dimension. Prepare one backup per dimension, so a deep follow-up doesn’t leave you stuck. If the athlete story is clearly better than your best professional Drive story, use it, and keep it as your only non-professional one.

I’m happy to look at an outline of any story if you’d like to share one. Good luck!

Profile picture of Alessa
Alessa
Coach
2 days ago
Ex-McKinsey | Ex-BCG | Ex-Roland Berger

Hey there :)

I’d prioritize professional examples where possible, given your 3.5 years of consulting experience, but strong academic or extracurricular stories can absolutely work if they show meaningful personal impact. Your competitive sports experience sounds particularly promising for Drive, and the leadership story could work well if you can demonstrate your individual contribution and the challenges you overcame.

The key is the depth of the story, not just how recent it is. Happy to practice with you and help you refine your stories if you’d like!

Best, Alessa :)

Profile picture of Cristian
2 days ago
ex-McKinsey | Holistic approach | >400 clients coached

Hi there,

I recommend you prioritise experiences from the past 2-3 years (the more recent, the better), and ideally you lean more into professional examples. Especially since you do have professional experience. 

But most importantly, make sure your stories actually fit the dimensions and they're as relevant as possible. 

If you have any specific questions, don't hesitate to drop me a line. 

Best,
Cristian

Profile picture of Vanessa
Vanessa
Coach
2 days ago
Former McKinsey Senior Recruiter & Zeiss CVC | Insights from the Other Side of the Table | CV & Personal Fit Mastery

Hey there,

Professional or academic settings should always be your baseline. Working within a company, startup, client project, or student initiative automatically provides the complex stakeholder dynamics that interviewers naturally look for.

It is important that the story matches your level of seniority - so avoid a situation that you already used years before. I am sure you gained some more experiences that show more deeply what you learned. I would in general look for situations during the last 6-8 months.

What to avoid in general:

  • Emotional or vulnerable narratives: Family challenges, relationship conflicts, or personal hardships do not evaluate consulting competencies and make the context awkward to assess objectively.
  • Low-stakes achievements: Completing a routine hobby project or casual group activity does usually not satisfy the bar.
Profile picture of Moritz
Moritz
Coach
21 hrs ago
Ex-McKinsey interviewer, genuinely invested in you | 100% McKinsey case & PEI prep turning nerves into real confidence

Lots of tactical advice so far and they're somewhat missing the point.

I have a lot of experience with McKinsey PEI (as an interviewer and coach) and my advice is that you should prioritize the stories that best showcase the skills that McKinsey is looking for within each of these dimensions. If you prioritize for anything else, you're hurting yourself.

If you're unsure as to what McKinsey is looking for within each of the dimensions, how to identify the right experiences and develop them into compelling stories, check out this guide: McKinsey PEI Guide: Build Winning Interview Stories | PrepLounge