Would you approach this question from the population or the land size point of view? Or is there a better angle to approach the question
BCG | Kellogg MBA |82% Success rate| 450+ case interview| 5+ year consulting | 30+ projects in ~10 countries
Would you approach this question from the population or the land size point of view? Or is there a better angle to approach the question
I would use the population although it will be very sensitive to many assumptions.
It looks very difficult to make meaningful assumptions in terms of land size.
Cheers
Serhat
This is an uncommon question, to be honest.
There are a lot of assumptions involved with both the methods you suggest.
Two points from my side: