Exp hire BCG online test - weird actual test vs practice

Question

Hi,

I'd be grateful for any feedback. I took the BCG quant reasoning test for exp hires a few days ago.
Something is off about the test.

I spent a month practicing SHL tests etc because I was worried about my speed. My normative decile went from 20 -> 80th consistently before the test. When i took the official practice test, I got 80%.

Then I took the test, and I wasn't nervous etc... but on a difficulty spectrum, it was one of the hardest tests I've done. I read somewhere on preplounge that it has an adaptive difficulty - is this true? and is the decile based on normative performance? It would explain a lot.

A final question. Does BCG strictly filter EH applications based on this test, regardless of the CV etc, for experienced hires. Or would other elements have been taken into consideration at the EH level.

Thanks for your help.

p.s.
FYI, I finished the test, though skipped a few questions... Nonetheless. It was hard test experience.

Answer 1

hey there :)

Yes i know, the BCG online test for experienced hires is adaptive in many regions, so if you perform well early on, the questions can get significantly harder. That often makes the real test feel tougher than SHL practice versions. The decile is typically based on normative performance compared to a benchmark group, not just raw percentage, so difficulty adjustment can definitely explain your experience.

For experienced hires, the test is important but not always the only filter. In most offices it is a strong screening tool, yet CV, background, and business need can still matter. It is rarely a purely mechanical cutoff, especially at EH level.

If you finished most questions and felt challenged, that can actually be a positive sign in an adaptive setup. Feel free to reach out if you want to discuss your profile in more detail.

best,
Alessa :)

Answer 2

That feeling—that the actual test was significantly harder and more taxing than the official practice material—is extremely common, especially with the screening tools used by BCG and Bain for Experienced Hires. You are right to suspect something beyond standard difficulty.

Here is the reality of that specific screen: yes, it has an adaptive component. The system is designed to triage candidates efficiently. If you perform well on the initial segments, answering quickly and accurately, the algorithm deliberately escalates the difficulty to find your ceiling. The fact that the test felt exceptionally difficult actually suggests you were scoring at a high level early on, pushing you into the top difficulty buckets. The decile performance is always normative, meaning you are being compared against other applicants, which for EH roles includes a very strong peer set.

Regarding the filtering process, for most Experienced Hire roles below the Principal or Associate Director level, the quant test is treated as a strict, high-volume filter. The firm receives too many applications to manually review every single top-tier CV. The test is a highly effective, low-cost method of triaging the pipeline. While your CV will eventually be the most important factor in the interview stage, you typically must clear the algorithmic threshold first before your resume and background are seriously considered by a human recruiter or manager.

You did all you could by finishing, even with skips. Now, put that experience aside. If you clear the hurdle, fantastic. If not, the cooling-off period is usually six to twelve months depending on the specific application channel. Use this time to refine your story and focus on networking or targeted lateral entry at another MBB/Tier-2 if you need a strong plan B.

All the best.