Back to overview

Could you check whether there is anything excessive or missing in the structure below for the investment decision case?

The client is a gold-mining company. The question is whether to purchase the technology (no info) that increases the processing plant efficiency.
 

1) Financial attractiveness (Revenue, Costs changes, Investment required)

2) Operational aspects 

1) Technology characteristics (lifespan, capacity, etc)
2) Technology within production process (bottlenecks, available place and compatibility)

3) Feasibility 
1) Integration complexity 
2) Postintegration risks

1
< 100
0
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Profile picture of Evelina
Evelina
Coach
1 hr ago
EY-Parthenon l Ex-Deloitte l BCG offer l LBS

Hi there,

A cleaner and more MECE way to structure this investment decision could look like:

• Financial attractiveness
– Incremental impact on cash flows and profitability
– Investment required and payback or returns
– Sensitivity to key assumptions (e.g. gold price, throughput)

• Implementation feasibility
– Technology fit with existing production process
– Capacity and bottlenecks
– Integration complexity and timeline
– Operational reliability and post-integration risks

• Strategic and risk considerations
– Alignment with long term strategy and competitiveness
– Scalability and future optionality
– Regulatory, safety, and environmental risks

This keeps the focus on the decision while avoiding overlap between operational and feasibility topics.

Best,
Evelina