Consulting Consulting
Zurück zur Übersicht

Communicating a Profitability Structure for BCG

I have been advised that the structure should be :

1. Concise

2. Specific to the problem

3. Have Hypothesis

-1636493537-dz3u69gntxhu.jpg

For a profitability case, to cover the 3 goals, the structure spills into 4 layers and during communication, it does not appear articulate. 

Are there any suggestions on how to communicate a complex profitability case structure while keeping the 3 goals in consideration? ( Please find attached a sample structure with 4 levels that I tried to communicate and ended up being incoherent )

6
2
1,8k
Schreibe die erste Antwort!
Bisher hat niemand auf diese Frage reagiert.
Beste Antwort
Profilbild von Ian
Ian
Coach
am 10. Nov. 2021
Ex-BCG | NYU Stern | MBB, Tech, & Strategy Coach | 5,000+ Sessions | 500+ Offers | 1,000+ Candidates | 100+ Countries

Hi there,

There's so much to unpick here that a Q&A won't quite do it justice.

  1. I don't see costs anywhere
  2. You've limited yourself in your revenue structure (are performance and management fees the only way to make $?)
  3. You've gone too many layers down
  4. How physically communicate/articulate this is so critical (and something we cannot assess here)
Profilbild von Pedro
Pedro
Coach
am 9. Nov. 2021
BAIN | EY-Parthenon | Roland Berger | Former Principal | FIT & PEI Expert

Are you concerned about the structure or about how you communicate it? Here I have the structure, but no idea on how you present it. Also why do you say you are incoherent?

Regarding the structure, you have a relevant mistake in there. You have volume as a subset of management fee, but actually volume impacts performance fee as well. So you need a different structure.