Back to overview

Communicating a Profitability Structure for BCG

I have been advised that the structure should be :

1. Concise

2. Specific to the problem

3. Have Hypothesis

-1636493537-dz3u69gntxhu.jpg

For a profitability case, to cover the 3 goals, the structure spills into 4 layers and during communication, it does not appear articulate. 

Are there any suggestions on how to communicate a complex profitability case structure while keeping the 3 goals in consideration? ( Please find attached a sample structure with 4 levels that I tried to communicate and ended up being incoherent )

6
2
1.9k
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Profile picture of Ian
Ian
Coach
on Nov 10, 2021
Ex-BCG | NYU Stern | MBB, Tech, & Strategy Coach | 5,000+ Sessions | 500+ Offers | 1,000+ Candidates | 100+ Countries

Hi there,

There's so much to unpick here that a Q&A won't quite do it justice.

  1. I don't see costs anywhere
  2. You've limited yourself in your revenue structure (are performance and management fees the only way to make $?)
  3. You've gone too many layers down
  4. How physically communicate/articulate this is so critical (and something we cannot assess here)
Want to learn more about this topic or join the discussion?
Sign up for free with PrepLounge and get access to first-hand insights from consulting experts, practical resources for your consulting interview preparation and an international community of candidates. Join the world’s largest case interview community.
Profile picture of Pedro
Pedro
Coach
on Nov 9, 2021
BAIN | EY-Parthenon | Roland Berger | Former Principal | FIT & PEI Expert

Are you concerned about the structure or about how you communicate it? Here I have the structure, but no idea on how you present it. Also why do you say you are incoherent?

Regarding the structure, you have a relevant mistake in there. You have volume as a subset of management fee, but actually volume impacts performance fee as well. So you need a different structure.