Can anyone share their experience in M&A PMI? Does it have better future than prospects strategy considering AI evoluation? Is it interesting than strategy? Heard its more functional so does it give better exposure than strategy to build startup?

That's a fantastic and nuanced question, and one that gets right to the heart of how different consulting tracks set up your career. There is often a lot of confusion about how operational roles like PMI stack up against classic Corporate Strategy.

Here is the key distinction: Pure Strategy focuses on the decision (where to play, how to win), while PMI focuses on the change (how to make the win happen). In terms of future-proofing against AI, PMI often has a better defense, ironically. AI is great at automating the analytical and modeling parts of strategy work (market sizing, competitive landscaping). It is extremely poor at handling complex human-system integration, change management, and navigating internal politics—which is 90% of what successful PMI work involves. It’s challenging, interesting work because you are dealing with live organizational chaos rather than just theoretical models.

Regarding your long-term goal of building a startup, PMI experience is generally more valuable than purely conceptual strategy work. A Strategy consultant delivers a PowerPoint defining the optimal market entry; a PMI consultant spends six months integrating two sales teams, defining new KPIs, and building the necessary operational processes from the ground up. Startups are execution machines. They need people who have experience designing real workflows, managing budgets for concrete deliverables, and navigating the operational friction inherent in growth—skills you get in spades doing large-scale integration and delivery.

If you are aiming for exit opportunities that involve operational leadership, hands-on growth roles, or founding a company, gravitate toward roles that mandate significant implementation experience. Strategy is prestige, but implementation is muscle memory.

Hope that helps you weigh the options!

hey there :)

M&A PMI is very hands on and execution heavy, with deep exposure to how companies actually integrate, operate and create value post deal, which many find more tangible than pure strategy. Given AI, PMI is arguably more resilient because execution, change and operating model work is harder to automate than slide based strategy. It is more functional, but that often gives better real world exposure for building a startup, especially around org design, processes and scaling. Strategy is broader and more conceptual, PMI is narrower but deeper. Happy to discuss if you want to compare both paths for your goals.

best,
Alessa :)

There are lots of answers to your questions. So you're going to get the most out of them if you actually use them as a coffee chat opportunity with people who work in each respective area. 

If this is not something you've tried yet, here's a guide that explains how to go about it:

• Expert Guide: How To Handle Networking Calls and Get Referrals

Best,
Cristian
 

Hi there,

Whether it's more interesting is really subjective. Some find high-level strategy work more interesting while others want to roll up their sleeves. In terms of building a start-up, you tend to have to roll up your sleeves so M&A PMI experience would definitely come in handy.