Was wondering if anybody has insights on projects, work culture, resources etc at either of the firms, as well as which provides the clearer pathway to re-recruiting for MBB/T2 Strat later on?
Alvarez & Marsal vs Arthur D Little for undergrad internships in SEA
Alex,
I've had candidates go to both of them, but honestly, the best perspective you're going to get is through actual chats with consultants working there.
Reach out to some via linkedin (sharing a guide below in terms of how to build a funnel to approach people) and try to speak with 2-3 from each firm - ideally from a similar level of seniority as you, and from the same office or region.
Nothing is going to give you a better sense of what to expect.
Here's the guide I was mentioning above:
• • Expert Guide: How To Get Referrals Via LinkedIn?
Best,
Cristian
Hi Alex,
Honestly, I think both would give you equal chances to get into MBB/T2 strat firms later on - my sense is that either of these experiences would improve your chances to get to interviews, and it will be the interview performance that matters if you get an offer or not.
Suggest you use the interview OR reach out via LinkedIn to speak with consultants who are working or have formerly worked with these firms (in the specific office you'd do your internship in) to get a sense of the type of projects you'll be working on, and what the experience would be like, etc. and get a sense if you'd enjoy working with the person you're speaking with.
All the best!
Hi Alex :)
Both are solid internships, but they are quite different in positioning. Arthur D. Little is closer to classic strategy work, which usually makes the transition to MBB or other strategy firms a bit more straightforward. Alvarez & Marsal tends to focus more on restructuring, performance improvement, and operational work, which is also strong but slightly less aligned with pure strategy recruiting. For someone aiming to re recruit for MBB or T2 strategy later, ADL is typically the clearer path, though strong performance at either firm can still open doors.
Hope this helps and feel free to reach out if you have more questions.
Best,
Alessa :)
That's a really common question, and a smart one to ask when you're thinking about your next move. Both Alvarez & Marsal and Arthur D Little are respected names, but they operate in slightly different lanes, especially regarding how they're perceived for future MBB/T2 strategy recruiting.
For re-recruiting, the most important factor isn't necessarily the brand name alone, but the story you can tell about your impact and the skills you developed. A&M is known for its operational restructuring and turnaround work – very hands-on, high-stakes problem-solving. If you can articulate how you analyzed a business, identified strategic levers for improvement, or helped execute a transformation, that experience is incredibly valuable. ADL, on the other hand, is more aligned with traditional strategy and innovation consulting, which can sometimes provide a more "direct read" for MBB/T2 recruiters looking for those specific project types.
Ultimately, your goal is to gain transferable skills and compelling stories for your resume and interviews. Look into the specific projects they're doing in SEA. Does one offer more direct client exposure? More structured problem-solving frameworks? Try to speak to recent interns or alums from both firms' SEA offices to get a granular sense of the actual work you'd be doing. Either can be an excellent stepping stone if you actively seek out challenging work and build a strong narrative around it.
Hope this helps!
Both are solid but quite different.
A&M is restructuring and performance improvement work. Intense, hands-on, analytical. ADL is more classic strategy, technology and innovation focus. Smaller office in SEA means more senior exposure but fewer resources.
On MBB re-recruiting, neither gives you a direct pathway. What matters is the story you build, not the logo.
A&M tends to give you harder, more analytical problems. ADL maps closer to MBB project language. If I had to pick one purely for MBB re-recruiting, I would lean A&M. The problem-solving intensity is higher, which is better prep.
But honestly, the difference is small. Your prep and your story will matter far more than the firm name.
Good luck with the decision.