I’m considering private equity recruiting and targeting KKR. How do their on-cycle and off-cycle processes differ, and what should I be aware of when deciding which to pursue?
How does KKR’s recruiting process differ for on-cycle vs. off-cycle private equity roles?

I don't know about KKR specifically, but on-cycle recruiting typically happens in the fall or early year for roles starting in the summer or fall, with a structured process including case studies and interviews, while off-cycle recruiting occurs outside these windows, often on a rolling basis, and may have fewer slots available.
Both processes are similar, but on-cycle focuses on current students, while off-cycle can target those with more experience or missed earlier deadlines.

From my experience, KKR’s on-cycle process is fast-paced and competitive, typically wrapping up within days. It’s mainly targeted at top banking analysts and heavily focuses on technical skills.
The off-cycle process is more flexible, with opportunities opening throughout the year. It tends to be a bit slower and often includes a stronger emphasis on fit, making it a good option if you want more time to prepare or come from a non-traditional background.
Which one to pursue really depends on your timeline and level of readiness. If you’re well-prepared and in a top IB program, on-cycle could be worth targeting. If you prefer a more structured approach, off-cycle might be the better route. Hope that helps!





