What is the reasoning behind choosing that there won't be synergies savings related to travel, real estate/staff costs?

REA Reinsurance
New answer on Mar 05, 2020
1 Answer
1.9 k Views
Anonymous A asked on Mar 04, 2020

Overview of answers

Upvotes
  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Robert
Expert
Content Creator
replied on Mar 05, 2020
McKinsey offers w/o final round interviews - 100% risk-free - 10+ years MBB coaching experience - Multiple book author

Hi Anonymous,

Could you please be so kind and explain your question a bit more in detail, please? Honestly I did not get the question from the headline only.

Thanks for your help!

Robert

Was this answer helpful?
Anonymous on Mar 05, 2020

Hello Robert, no problem at all! So, what I don't get is how can we decide that we won't have any costs savings from the travels/staff/real estate? For example, in the case we have the following conclusion: Staff costs (excludes HQ) Eligible for synergies: Rather not. How is it reached? Thank you in advance, I hope I have been clearer!

(edited)

Jan Niklas on May 05, 2020

Good point, would also interest me!

How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely