Cookie and Privacy Settings

This website uses cookies to enable essential functions like the user login and sessions. We also use cookies and third-party tools to improve your surfing experience on preplounge.com. You can choose to activate only essential cookies or all cookies. You can always change your preference in the cookie and privacy settings. This link can also be found in the footer of the site. If you need more information, please visit our privacy policy.

Data processing in the USA: By clicking on "I accept", you also consent, in accordance with article 49 paragraph 1 sentence 1 lit. GDPR, to your data being processed in the USA (by Google LLC, Facebook Inc., LinkedIn Inc., Stripe, Paypal).

Manage settings individually I accept
1

What is the reasoning behind choosing that there won't be synergies savings related to travel, real estate/staff costs?

1 answer

  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Book a coaching with Robert

96% Recommendation Rate

308 Meetings

3,173 Q&A Upvotes

USD 219 / Coaching

Hi Anonymous,

Could you please be so kind and explain your question a bit more in detail, please? Honestly I did not get the question from the headline only.

Thanks for your help!

Robert

Hi Anonymous,

Could you please be so kind and explain your question a bit more in detail, please? Honestly I did not get the question from the headline only.

Thanks for your help!

Robert

Hello Robert, no problem at all! So, what I don't get is how can we decide that we won't have any costs savings from the travels/staff/real estate? For example, in the case we have the following conclusion: Staff costs (excludes HQ) Eligible for synergies: Rather not. How is it reached? Thank you in advance, I hope I have been clearer! — Anonymous on Mar 05, 2020 (edited)

Good point, would also interest me! — Jan Niklas on May 05, 2020

Similar questions

No similar questions available