Hello Robert, no problem at all! So, what I don't get is how can we decide that we won't have any costs savings from the travels/staff/real estate? For example, in the case we have the following conclusion: Staff costs (excludes HQ) Eligible for synergies: Rather not. How is it reached? Thank you in advance, I hope I have been clearer!
This website uses cookies to enable essential functions like the user login and sessions.
... (Read more)We also use cookies and third-party tools to improve your surfing experience on preplounge.com. You can choose to activate only essential cookies or all cookies. You can always change your preference in the cookie and privacy settings. This link can also be found in the footer of the site. If you need more information, please visit our privacy policy.
Data processing in the USA: By clicking on "I accept", you also consent, in accordance with article 49 paragraph 1 sentence 1 lit. a GDPR, to your data being processed in the USA. The USA is not considered to have adequate data protection legislation. If you need more information please view the individual settings.
Hello Robert, no problem at all! So, what I don't get is how can we decide that we won't have any costs savings from the travels/staff/real estate? For example, in the case we have the following conclusion: Staff costs (excludes HQ) Eligible for synergies: Rather not. How is it reached? Thank you in advance, I hope I have been clearer!
(edited)
Good point, would also interest me!