Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Interview Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview

Senior Knowledge Analyst

Hello, 

I was offered a Senior Knowledge Analyst position with McKinsey and to be honest I was a little underwhelmed by the pay. It's pretty much a lateral move from where I am now. I read a lot about the expert track and that progression is usually slower and making partner is more difficult. I wanted to see if there was any truth to that. I would like to make partner one day but from what I understand it's easier in the generalist track. I guess my overall question is, is it worth it? Is it worth taking the lateral move to get the McKinsey name on my resume if it's in the expert track? Again ideally I'd like to make partner but I also want to have a strong exit plan if I can just to keep options open and I'm not sure if I'll get the same opportunities in the expert track. 

6
2.8k
34
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Florian
Coach
on Apr 18, 2022
1400 5-star reviews across platforms | 600+ offers | Highest-rated case book on Amazon | Uni lecturer in US, Asia, EU

Hey there,

To get straight to the point.

I believe / from my observation it is not per se harder to become an expert partner (I have worked with quite a few expert APs who later made partner).

The reason you see maybe less expert partners is that more people who join as experts are happy with their lifestyle and explicitly do not want to go down the partner route.

Generally, in McKinsey, you are free to do whatever you want as long as your performance is up to par.

Hence, my suggestion is to go for it if that is your goal. It is definitely possible and I don't think more difficult :-)

All the best!

Cheers,

Florian

Clara
Coach
on Apr 17, 2022
McKinsey | Awarded professor at Master in Management @ IE | MBA at MIT |+180 students coached | Integrated FIT Guide aut

Hello!

Congratulations first, I guess, hehe. 

To really answer your question the key thing is: compared to what? What is the current position? And the potential alternatives? 

For some people it would be a great lateral move, and from some others the opportunity cost would be just too high. 

Hope it helps!

Cheers, 

Clara

Udayan
Coach
edited on Apr 18, 2022
Top rated Case & PEI coach/Multiple real offers/McKinsey EM in New York /12 years recruiting experience

If your main goals is to become a partner at McKinsey, the knowlege analyst track is not the ideal route to take. It takes extremely long, in fact most expert partners have spent ages in the industry building up their expertise before being offered partnership. In addition, the work is not client heavy to begin with which further delays progress. 

It will help with getting the McKinsey brand on your resume which you can leverage for roles in the future. However, the scope of these roles is also limited compared to a generalist consultant given the nature of tasks you will be performing vs a BA/Associate.

As a lateral move this is not something I would recommend to you.

Best,

Udayan

on Apr 18, 2022
#1 rated McKinsey Coach

Hi there, 

Great question!

I know the salary might be quite disappointing, but try seeing what some of the other perks might be. Prestige, for instance, is quite important in opening other doors in your career for many years to come. 

Progress to Partner is indeed slower on the expert track than on the integrative consulting part, but this is also changing very fast. The expert track to partner didn't virtually exist up until 5-6 years ago so you can expect thing to change further by the time you actually approach that level. 

Ian
Coach
on Apr 17, 2022
Top US BCG / MBB Coach - 5,000 sessions |Tech, Platinion, Big 4 | 9/9 personal interviews passed | 95% candidate success

Hi there,

It is extremely rare for an Analyst to become a consultant and then become a Partner. You should make this move with eyes wide open in this respect.

It's up to you whether it's worth switching for the McKinsey brand name, but Partner is going to be a very tall order with this switch!

Ken
Coach
on Apr 18, 2022
Ex-McKinsey final round interviewer | Executive Coach

The knowledge track (master expert partner NOT expert partner) is even less client facing within the broader expert track and so I don’t think it’s what you’re looking for.  Partnership at consultancies is largely based on client billable where the knowledge track is even more difficult than the expert partner track you have in mind.

Similar Questions
Consulting
Just did the Mckinsey Solve Game (January 2025) - got some questions/insights
on Apr 24, 2025
Global
5
3.3k
Top answer by
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 8+ years consulting, 8+ years coaching and 7+ years interviewing experience
38
5 Answers
3.3k Views
+2
Consulting
McKinsey PEI
on Apr 02, 2025
Global
7
2.1k
Top answer by
Deleted user
58
7 Answers
2.1k Views
+4
Consulting
Mckinsey framework structuring question
on Apr 30, 2024
Global
7
2.7k
Top answer by
Gero
Coach
Ex-BCG │200+ Interviews & Interview Coachings @ BCG │ 25+ candidates coached into MBB │WHU/LSE/Nova │ Teacher & Trainer
53
7 Answers
2.7k Views
+4
How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely
Thanks for your feedback! Your opinion helps us make PrepLounge even better.