Data processing in the USA: By clicking on "I accept", you also consent, in accordance with article 49 paragraph 1 sentence 1 lit. GDPR, to your data being processed in the USA (by Google LLC, Facebook Inc., LinkedIn Inc., Stripe, Paypal).

expert

Ian

100% Recommendation Rate

291 Meetings

USD 289 / Coaching

3

How do you structure this prompt?

Hello,

I came across this question in one of the online blogs and thought it was very interesting.

"An asteroid is going to hit the earth and destroy 100% of it. You have several options: create a missile to destroy it (blowing it into several particles which will still impact the earth but destroy only 50%), or create a missile to push it out of the way (this only has a 50% chance of working though). Which alternative do you pick?"

How do you structure something like this? What is the expectation for a prompt like this? Is it sufficient to just lay out an approach or is it an estimation of probability type of case?

Thanks.

Hello,

I came across this question in one of the online blogs and thought it was very interesting.

"An asteroid is going to hit the earth and destroy 100% of it. You have several options: create a missile to destroy it (blowing it into several particles which will still impact the earth but destroy only 50%), or create a missile to push it out of the way (this only has a 50% chance of working though). Which alternative do you pick?"

How do you structure something like this? What is the expectation for a prompt like this? Is it sufficient to just lay out an approach or is it an estimation of probability type of case?

Thanks.

• Date ascending
• Date descending

I have a question for you: What's the expected value (EV) in each of these scenarios?

They're the same. As such, no, it's not succifient to lay out estimation of probability.

I have another question for you: did you clarify the objective?

Clarify objective - are we trying to save humanity? Are we ok with living with 50% of the population dead?

It's all about objective here...the rest follows.

I won't provide a further framework as i think you should create it yourself with this objective in mind....post it and we'll review :)

Additionally, I've created a case with a very similar sort of dilema/thinking. Try it to see how you might think about the entire problem:

https://www.preplounge.com/en/management-consulting-cases/brain-teaser/beginner/coronavirus-times-covid-19-brainteaser-194

I have a question for you: What's the expected value (EV) in each of these scenarios?

They're the same. As such, no, it's not succifient to lay out estimation of probability.

I have another question for you: did you clarify the objective?

Clarify objective - are we trying to save humanity? Are we ok with living with 50% of the population dead?

It's all about objective here...the rest follows.

I won't provide a further framework as i think you should create it yourself with this objective in mind....post it and we'll review :)

Additionally, I've created a case with a very similar sort of dilema/thinking. Try it to see how you might think about the entire problem:

https://www.preplounge.com/en/management-consulting-cases/brain-teaser/beginner/coronavirus-times-covid-19-brainteaser-194

Hi Ian, thank you for your thoughts. The way I am thinking about this is as follows: Supposing that the objective is to save humanity, I would like to look at four broad factors - Technical aspects related to missiles, Human capabilities, and trade-offs. 1. Technical aspects - a. difference between technology of both missiles; b. how much time will it take to build each missile; c. Is it better to build one vs the other in terms of resources available; 2 - Human capabilities - a. Does it need international cooperation? If so, what is the timeline; b - is there a conflict of interest between countries; c - who will lead the mission; d - technical expertise; e - prior experience; trade-offs - a. difference between quality of life; b - can we say which 50% part of the world will be destroyed eg: Antarctica vs America? I apologize for the funky formatting. I am unable to do it the usual way. I would love your feedback on this structure. Thanks — ABCD on Jul 01, 2020

I think this is very structured and good! — Ian on Jul 04, 2020

However, again, just be careful....do you need all of that? Or, is it as simple as just clarifying...what do we care about most? — Ian on Jul 04, 2020

You are at risk of overcomplicating a problem to sound smart. It's easy to make thinks complicated, hard to make them simple :) — Ian on Jul 04, 2020

My main question is: Do any of your points change the expected outcome? Or are they all already embedded in that 50% vs 100%? — Ian on Jul 04, 2020

Hi!

I agree with Ian - it is all about the objective. If it is

• Avoid the extinction of humanity!

then there is a clear logic for the decision.

• You will avoid extinction of humanity with 100% probability in scenario 1 (even though it will come at the cost of having half of the planet devastated).
• You will only avoid the extinction of humanity with 50% in scenario 2.

So given the above objective, Scenario 1 appears preferable in rigorous terms.

Alternatively, you can also look at it through a "value at risk" lens.

• In scenario 1, only 50% of the earth is at risk.
• In scenario 2, 100% of the earth is at risk.

So again, rigorous logic leads to choice of scenario 1.

Cheers,

Sidi

Hi!

I agree with Ian - it is all about the objective. If it is

• Avoid the extinction of humanity!

then there is a clear logic for the decision.

• You will avoid extinction of humanity with 100% probability in scenario 1 (even though it will come at the cost of having half of the planet devastated).
• You will only avoid the extinction of humanity with 50% in scenario 2.

So given the above objective, Scenario 1 appears preferable in rigorous terms.

Alternatively, you can also look at it through a "value at risk" lens.

• In scenario 1, only 50% of the earth is at risk.
• In scenario 2, 100% of the earth is at risk.

So again, rigorous logic leads to choice of scenario 1.

Cheers,

Sidi

(edited)

Hello!

Honestly, I don´t think you would get something like this in strategy consulting interviews.

In any case, if you did -and would be rather cool-, I would agree with:

1. Agreeing on any specific targets
2. Finding out constraints we might have (e.g., in terms of timing, economically, etc.)
3. Splitting your tree in "lines of action" (e.g., building the missile, imitating the movie Interstellar and finding a way out of Earth, etc.) and discussing each of them

Hope it helps!

Cheers,

Clara

Hello!

Honestly, I don´t think you would get something like this in strategy consulting interviews.

In any case, if you did -and would be rather cool-, I would agree with:

1. Agreeing on any specific targets
2. Finding out constraints we might have (e.g., in terms of timing, economically, etc.)
3. Splitting your tree in "lines of action" (e.g., building the missile, imitating the movie Interstellar and finding a way out of Earth, etc.) and discussing each of them

Hope it helps!

Cheers,

Clara

Related case(s)

MBB Final Round Case - Smart Education

Solved 18.4k times
MBB Final Round Case - Smart Education Our client is SmartBridge, a nonprofit educational institution offering face-to-face tutoring services. The client operates in the US. The mission of SmartBridge is to help as many students as possible to complete studies and prevent that they drop from the school system, in particular in disadvantaged areas. The client is considering starting operations for its services in the Chicago area. They hired us to understand if that makes sense. Due to the nonprofit regulation, SmartBridge should operate on its own in the market, without any partnership. How would you help our client?
| Rating: (4.6 / 5.0)

Our client is SmartBridge, a nonprofit educational institution offering face-to-face tutoring services. The client operates in the US. The mission of SmartBridge is to help as many students as possible to complete studies and prevent that they drop from the school system, in particular in disadvant ... Open whole case

Bain 1st Round Case – BlissOttica

Solved 2.5k times
Bain 1st Round Case – BlissOttica Our client is a BlissOttica, an Eyewear Manufacturer that is looking to reach a 10% increase in profits. How would you help our client?
| Rating: (4.3 / 5.0)

Our client is a BlissOttica, an Eyewear Manufacturer that is looking to reach a 10% increase in profits. How would you help our client? Open whole case

Merger of two beer manufacturers

Solved < 100 times
Merger of two beer manufacturers Our clients are two beer manufacturers from a well-developed country who just decided to merge. We can call them Company A and Company B. The decision about the merger has already been taken and our clients are certain it will soon be approved by regulators. What is expected from you is to help them with two objectives: Firstly, they would like you to help them decrease the costs of their post-merger operations. Secondly, they would like you to help them develop a new marketing strategy. How would you like to go about helping our clients?
| Rating: (0.0 / 5.0)

Our clients are two beer manufacturers from a well-developed country who just decided to merge. We can call them Company A and Company B. The decision about the merger has already been taken and our clients are certain it will soon be approved by regulators. What is expected from you is to help the ... Open whole case