I think I tackled the question quite well but then the interviewer didn't seem very confident. I would like to hear your thoughts on what would be a good approach / framework?
Many thanks!
I think I tackled the question quite well but then the interviewer didn't seem very confident. I would like to hear your thoughts on what would be a good approach / framework?
Many thanks!
Hi Anonymous,
I agree with Bruno, it would be easier to judge your framework if you could report it below. It could also be that your framework was good, but you did not communicate it effectively, for example not linking the various layers to the actual goal of the client.
In terms of the general structure for a due diligence you can consider the following:
1) Goal clarification. It is always good to start with the end in mind โ thus what is the specific reason why they want to buy the company? Just make profits reselling in 3 years for a higher price? Benefit from synergies with a portfolio company? Test the market for a bigger acquisition?
2) Industry. There are two macrovariables here.
You should present this area connecting with the goal, and not purely listing the elements to analyse as if it was a laundry list. The best way to do so is explain how a certain variable will help you to achieve you goal. Eg, if your goal is to increase revenues, donโt simply say โI want to look at growth, size and BTEโ, rather โI want to look at growth and size โ this will tell me if the market has the potential to provide enough revenues for our client. I would also like to check BTE, to understand which are the obstacles in entering such a market and thus increase revenuesโ.
3) Company - Target objective feasibility. Here you want to check the fit between the client and the selected industries.
In the first point, you will probably have to go through a profitability/revenue/cost framework, to calculate the effective result.
4) Price and capabilities. Once you know the industry is attractive and you can reach you goal, you should consider if the price is fair and you have enough capabilities
You can find more information on theย DCF analysis at the link below: https://www.preplounge.com/en/consulting-forum/case-net-present-value-calculations-325
5)ย Risks and next steps. What are the major elements that we should further analyse based on the previous points (eg regulator decision, potential other targets to consider, implementation risks)?
Hope this helps,
Francesco
Hey,
Let me give you the example on how I would have approached it (that said, there are several other ways to approach that could be equally effective):
- analyze the market/external factors: how sizable is currently the market and any growht expectation into the future? (demand side); what about the competitive landscape? any relevant regulations/barriers to entry? (supply side)
- analyze the company internal factors:ย what's the historical financial performance (traditional profitability tree; include benchmark vs. competitors and market share)? do they have the right/neededย capabilities (production, distribution, transport, management)?
- transaction itself: adequate pricing, how to finance the transaction
Anyway, if you want to have a better understanding on whether your framework was good or not, just add it here, so that we can checkย
Best
Bruno
Hi,
For commercial DDย you can use the following structure:
Market
Competition
Companyย
Feasibility of exit:
Best
Hi there,
Providing some market sizing thinking for anyone revisiting this Q&A:
Remember that there's rarely a "best" answer with market sizing. What's important is that you break down the problem the way it makes sense to you. Importantly, break it down so that the assumptions you make are the ones you're most comfortable in.
For example, do you know all the major brands? Great go with that. Do you understand all the segments of that country's population (either age or wealth or job breakdown)? Go with that. Do you know the total market size of the tourism (or hotel) industry? Then break it down that way.
Some tips: