Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Interview Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview

What is the value of an invention

I got a case on how to determine the value of an invention. And I'd like to ask for feedback on the approach I used. 

The approach

 came to know that it's patented and did the following:

The value will depend on the cash that it will generate over the years of the patent which will depend on how it will be commercialized (or until a new technology will substitute it) 

The framework: 

1- Understand the business opportunity of the invention 

  • Market growth rates
  • Market size
  • Potential EBIT 
  • How often does the technology change in such an industry

2- Commercialization strategy:

Do we require strategic resources that other established firms have?

How easy is it to copy the invention?

  • Partner with an existing player (since our invention will make their products obsolete and we can negotiate a good deal) 
  • Dot it ourselves
  • Royalty fee

3-  Chose a valuation method 

  • Market approach (EBIT/revenue multiples) 
  • Discounted cash flow. The approach I chose accounting also for the synergies the company can avail (justification provided) 
  • Cost based approach (Not applicable since cost was marginal) 
     

Next steps: 
Assess the right partner, analyze possible competition reaction and address market risks 

1
1.1k
16
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Hagen
Coach
on Feb 18, 2023
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 9+ years consulting, interviewing and coaching experience

Hi there,

I think this is an interesting question that may be relevant for many people. I would be happy to share my thoughts on it:

  • In my opinion, there is room for improvement in your approach, especially since I feel your approach does not really fit the question at hand. For instance, using multiples would not be meaningful for an invention since there are no true comparables available.
  • Moreover, I feel you have not addressed the core of the question stringently enough. Instead of gathering a lot of information in the first two steps, regardless of whether it is useful or not, I would advise you to consider what information is necessary to carry out the calculations and ask about it in either the clarifying questions or a short market analysis section. For instance, instead of discussing the ease of copying the invention, which was not asked for, I would advise you to inquire about the expected time until a competitive product is released and whether there is a preliminary assessment of the market share it will take.

If you would like a more detailed discussion on how to structure any case study question, please don't hesitate to contact me directly.

Best,

Hagen