Should I mention the risks to taking my final recommendation and risks to implementing my strategy during my conclusion?
Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Interview-Partner:innen, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!
Zurück zur Übersicht
20
For the calculation of annual pass holders, isn't it 60,000 passes, given that we assume that 600,000 visitors use their pass 10 times per season?
10
Risks?
1
3,0k

Schreibe die erste Antwort!
Bisher hat niemand auf diese Frage reagiert.
Beste Antwort

Vlad
am 15. Aug. 2018
Coach
McKinsey / Accenture Alum / Got all BIG3 offers / Harvard Business School
Hi,
It really depends on whether you have anything else to explore, that is more important than risks. The typical structure is the following:
- What was the objective
- Your recommendation
- Arguments why the recommendation is valid (2-4 arguments) with the supporting numbers
- Additional things you would like to explore. In the order of priority:
- Things you still need to explore / data you need to get in order to provide a valid recommendation (Very typical for McKinsey cases where the interviewer guides you and interrupts in the middle of the case to provide a conclusion
- Things you've slightly covered during the case but have not come to a particular measurable solution or were not the part of the original objective (e.g. alternative growth options or some questions on creativity)
- Risks
- Next steps
In my view, the last part (4th) of your recommendation should not be bigger than the rest of the recommendation (1-3), thus I will talk about risks if I have perfectly covered everything else in the case.
Example:
- Our objectives were to understand why the profit is declining by X and how to bring the profit back within one year (Don't forget that your objective should be measurable in terms of money / other metric and time)
- According to the analysis we've done so far, my recommendation is to shut down the division A and to concentrate on the divisions b/c if we want to increase the profit, and there is a number of reasons for that.. (Remember that your arguments should include numbers).
- You provide the arguments a) First of all, problems in Division A are the major driver of the decline in profits - 90% of the decline in profits refer to Division A. b) Secondly, the decline is driven by the contracting market size that is shrinking at xx percent and is not expected to improve in the near future. c) Finally....
- Additionally, I would like to check the option of seeling the division A products abroad. We have discussed several potential markets to enter but still have to check whether it will be feasible for us financially
Best!
0 Kommentare
Jetzt kostenlos anmelden, um alle Antworten zu lesen.
Jetzt kostenlos anmelden, um alle Antworten zu lesen.

Ähnliche Fragen
Beliebteste Beiträge
BCG Dubai hardware
8
am 26. Aug. 2025
Asien
3
100+

Beste Antwort von
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 9+ years consulting, interviewing and coaching experience
3 Antworten
100+ Aufrufe


What can I expect from McKinsey onboarding?
8
am 27. Aug. 2025
USA
2
100+

Beste Antwort von
Evelina
Coach
EY-Parthenon (7 years) l BCG offer holder l 7+ years coaching l 30% off first session l free 15' intro call l LBS
2 Antworten
100+ Aufrufe

McK or ATK?
10
am 27. Aug. 2025
DACH
8
900+

Beste Antwort von
Pedro
Coach
30% discount in September | Experienced interviewer & consultant (+5 years) | ex-BCG | RWE
8 Antworten
900+ Aufrufe


+5
BCG Internship Interview Preparation in 7 Days - Taipei
9
am 27. Aug. 2025
Asien
6
500+

Beste Antwort von
Lukas
Coach
50% OFF on first 2 sessions | ~10yrs in consulting | ex-BCG Project Leader | Personalized prep & coaching | INSEAD MBA
6 Antworten
500+ Aufrufe


+3
Frage zu
Case
am 29. Aug. 2025
Global
2
300+

Beste Antwort von
Evelina
Coach
EY-Parthenon (7 years) l BCG offer holder l 7+ years coaching l 30% off first session l free 15' intro call l LBS
2 Antworten
300+ Aufrufe
