I doubt FB will ever charge users for dating like tinder etc. I am assuming they did this because it aligns with their mission to bring the world closer together? What would be a good way to structure this?
(edited)
I doubt FB will ever charge users for dating like tinder etc. I am assuming they did this because it aligns with their mission to bring the world closer together? What would be a good way to structure this?
(edited)
Many great answers here already.
If I was stepping back from the immediate question, I would suggest examining Facebook's rationale for any new product it launches.
What is the purpose? Why does it continue launching and acquiring?
Fundamentally, you can reframe Facebook's strategy to be around maintenance vs. growth, given its position on the s-curve of mass adoption. It is clear from Facebook's history of recent acquisitions, Zuckerberg is very well aware of the innovator's dilemma, and attempting to disrupt the core business and diversify at the same time.
For example, with WhatsApp (a closed P2P network), or Instagram (a separate photo sharing platform i.e. usurping what was Facebook's original raison d'etre).
Why?
What is the greatest existential threat to Facebook maintaining its scale and dominance? Losing relevance.
Any network can only remain relevant so long as it delivers value to all members on an ongoing basis. A loss of relevance occurs through 1000 cuts, not 1.
This I would imagine would be a core concern in the minds of FB's board, major shareholders and the ExecCo.
One form of relevance is maintaining a moat from network effects, but Facebook's biggest issue at present is churn and the distribution of its network skewing away from the early adoptors and cultural influencers.
Will the launch of a dating product (albeit a generic one, just on Facebook), mean it increases engagement with a highly valuable demographic for advertisers and reduces churn due to lock-up on the network? Possibly.
Are there likely to be strong data crossovers from a richer social graph if combined with dating patterns? Highly likely.
Will 18-34yo adopt Facebook dating when they've been slowly transitioning off the platform as its been unbundled over the past 3-5 years? Time will tell.
I agree with Vlad's analysis.
It is a very complementary business that can be monetized in many different ways. They can charge directly for the service or for premium features that are rolled out over time and leverage the product to create additional advertising space.
As you say it fits in with their mission of bringing people together but these kinds of decisions are made based on profit potential. The fact that it is highly complementary to its existing product means that the likelihood of success is high.
Another interesting angle for Facebook is likely also the additional data that they can collect from the dating product. As you probably already know they already use the data you enter to create the most targeted advertising product out there today.
Yes, but having worked in tech companies in bay area, I know very well that FB particularly is a very mission driven company and money is secondary for them. I spoke to one my ex colleagues at FB now and it was indeed an engagement play. I was particularly looking for the best way to structure my answer, I am confident that this product decision was based on the companies mission and monetization is side benefit but not the primarily goal.
(edited)
Okay it is fair but then how is user engagement not tied to monetization then if looking at this from the facebook platform perspective and not a product perspective? A rough structure could then incorporate a) monetisation from increased engagement and subsequent reduced churn b) any monetisation from new user growth c) impact on company mission
(edited)
Monetization is a side effect of product engagement, not a primary objective. A lot of FB products don't make any money - such as live, watch etc. which are operationally extremely expensive. The main reason for building them is increase user connection and ads comes in only when it doesn't diminish user engagement. If you look at FB daily active and monthly active users, it has only gone up YoY despite introducing ads product and that is because they prioritize user experience.
(edited)
Hi,
It's an additional revenue stream (a very good one if you look at the financials of the dating apps) with very low extra costs for them (since they already have the users on their platform). + they can drive engagement (that is declining overall) and new younger users (since the dating apps users are on multiple apps)
Best
I doubt FB will ever charge users for dating like tinder etc. I am assuming they did this because it aligns with their mission to bring the world closer together? What would be a good way to structure this?
Hello!
It´s easy to analyse if it was a business case:
Hope it helps!
Cheers,
Clara
Hi, I think in the discussion all the aspects have been covered. As first, always think about profits, then of course the synergies with all their related platforms are crucial
Best,
Antonello
Hi
Facebook strategy is clearly to gather a highly consequent part of the online traffic.
I would go for following structure
A) Analysis of the online traffic (with a gap analysis with what Facebook did)
B) Opportunity to integrate the dating market (revenue, client experience, ...)
Best
Hi
I agree with the comments of the people below. But I want to add a very important fact: Facebook did market research and found out that 52% of users of Facebook are single. That is why Facebook took the decision to enter this very lucrative business segment and make an offer to its own users.
Hi again,
If you are sure that they have done it because of their mission to “bring the world closer together” and that monetary aspect is always secondary for them, then dating functionality has a positive affect on 4 areas connected with that mission:
I hope this is now the right focus.
Best,
Daniel
Structured framework for sustainable corporate development, including market penetration, product development, market development and diversification.
Learn everything you need to know about CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) for your case interview ✔ Definition ✔ Formula ✔ Examples ✔ Applications ✔
Discover the secrets to Goal setting, Reality checking, Options exploring, and Way forward planning that will redefine your path to success.
Learn everything about the Growth Strategies for your case interview while applying for a job in consulting or in a big accounting firm.
The Blue Ocean Strategy advocates for the generation and seizure of new demand in untapped or uncontested market spaces. Learn how to apply it in our basics!