If I'm trying to develop a structure on whether a company should enter a new market and I want to capture these aspects: 1) check if it's financially viable 2) see if they can execute against it 3) look at any risks they may face.. it makes sense to check the financial viability first (so prioritize this) and then if that looks fine, look at the remaining two factors.
so my question is 1) is it fine if I list the 3 factors to the interviewer, in 1 line explain what each means and then say that I want to prioritize factor #1 and deep-dive into drivers? I could say that I can elaborate on the other 2 factors if the interviewer would like but logically it makes sense to dive into the details of what I would explore in the first bucket.
2) if I leave it up to interviewer and they ask me to elaborate on the other 2 buckets..is it ok to ask for a few seconds to further structure this (and develop drivers)? Or would I have been expected to have the details written down from the start?
(edited)
