Numerical reasoning number sequence

numerical reasoning test Psychometric test
New answer on Mar 21, 2023
5 Answers
61 Views
Philippine
Premium
asked on Mar 18, 2023

Going through psychometric test exercises and came accrpss this sequence I cant make sense of. Answer is below. Can anyone explain? 

The number sequence I have is: 

3 ? 4 6 4

What is the missing number and why? 

Possible answers:

(a) -1 (b) 0 (c )1 (d) 2

 

 

 

Also, would be great to have any practice tips for these if anyone has any recommendation! The book I'm using only has answers but no explanations…

 

-------------------

answer: d

Overview of answers

Upvotes
  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Best answer
Pedro
Expert
replied on Mar 18, 2023
Bain | EY-Parthenon | Roland Berger |Former Head Recruiter | Market Sizing

Sorry, this is non-sense. The problem with these kind of sequences is that if they are not long enough, one is able to find ways to fit in different numbers. 

I was trying to create an answer, but I can find ways for it to be c) and for it to be d). And I can find an absurd number of potential sequences after the 5th number (meaning that there's a significant ammount of potential different rules for this sequence).

I wish I could have some good material to recommend to you, but i don't.

In any case, just move on from that question - it's badly written. You need a 6th number in the sequence to narrow down the potential number of rules that could be used.

Was this answer helpful?
Emily
Expert
Content Creator
replied on Mar 21, 2023
Ex McKinsey EM & interviewer (5 yrs) USA & UK| Coached / interviewed 200 +|Free 15 min intro| Stanford MBA|Non-trad

This could be all sorts of numbers. I would move on and try one of the GMAT prep books which hopefully has better questions

Was this answer helpful?
Hagen
Expert
Content Creator
updated an answer on Mar 19, 2023
Ex-Bain and interviewer for 7+ years | >95% success rate | mentor and coach for 6+ years

Hi Philippine,

I think this is an interesting question that may be relevant for many people. I would be happy to share my thoughts on it:

  • First of all, while I would have also guessed that answer D would be the correct one (based on the logic x2/3 - +2 - +2 - x2/3), I feel this might not be a meaningful exercise, especially given the sequence is too short to identify a logic that goes across three items.
  • Moreover, I would advise you to primarily use the reasoning part of the official GMAT preparation material to practice numerical, verbal, and abstract reasoning.

If you would like a more detailed discussion on how to best prepare for your upcoming interviews, please don't hesitate to contact me directly.

Best,

Hagen

(edited)

Was this answer helpful?
Andreas
Expert
replied on Mar 19, 2023
McKinsey EM | Top MBB Coach | >70% Success Rate | Free Introductory Calls

Agree with what has been said before. Not sure in which context you found this question, but have hardly come across this question format in consulting context.

Was this answer helpful?
Ian
Expert
Content Creator
replied on Mar 18, 2023
MBB | 100% personal interview success rate (8/8) and 95% candidate success rate | Personalized interview prep

Hi there,

I totally agree with Pedro.

I highly highly recommend you use resources that provide explanations for the answer!

Was this answer helpful?
Pedro gave the best answer

Pedro

Bain | EY-Parthenon | Roland Berger |Former Head Recruiter | Market Sizing
100
Meetings
9,025
Q&A Upvotes
32
Awards
5.0
17 Reviews