Hi,
So, the first thing is: It's very very hard to evaluate yourself.
Ideally when you case with other preploungers or a coach, they are the ones providing this feedback. Then, you make sure to save it and/or reformat it to review later.
Personally, when reviewing canditates, I lay out my feedback like in the image below, specifically. I include a final "Summary" page of all pros/cons, which is the general feedback to which you're referring.
Of course, I do this across the key criteria of:
- Structure
- Judgement/Insights
- Creativity
- Math/Quantitative
- Case leadership (hypothesis-driven)
- Synthesis
- Presence
- Communication
- etc.
Form example, there could be 3 instances where math was a problem. I would write down all 3 instances according to where they occured in the case...this would be specific. In my summary page, I would write down, in general, what was wrong with the math (i.e. forgot numbers, didn't do math properly, need to understand context of numbers, ask to round, etc.)

Hi,
So, the first thing is: It's very very hard to evaluate yourself.
Ideally when you case with other preploungers or a coach, they are the ones providing this feedback. Then, you make sure to save it and/or reformat it to review later.
Personally, when reviewing canditates, I lay out my feedback like in the image below, specifically. I include a final "Summary" page of all pros/cons, which is the general feedback to which you're referring.
Of course, I do this across the key criteria of:
- Structure
- Judgement/Insights
- Creativity
- Math/Quantitative
- Case leadership (hypothesis-driven)
- Synthesis
- Presence
- Communication
- etc.
Form example, there could be 3 instances where math was a problem. I would write down all 3 instances according to where they occured in the case...this would be specific. In my summary page, I would write down, in general, what was wrong with the math (i.e. forgot numbers, didn't do math properly, need to understand context of numbers, ask to round, etc.)
