I agree with Florian and Ken that your framework is too unspecific. To help you make it better, here my thoughts:

• The core of your framework is a very superficial, generic analysis (Political, Socio-economic, Technology, Education). This should be adjusted to dissect the problem, develop a working hypothesis and help you answer the actual question, e.g. like this:
• Hypothesis: In order for somebody to have interest in the vaccine, 3 conditions need to be met. If anyone of these is not met, people will not bother with the vaccine:
  • COVID is a problem: COVID is either a perceived risk or imposes an actual restriction on personal freedom, earning opportunities, etc.
  • The vaccine can alleviate the problem: The vaccine can reduce the risk of getting sick and once everybody's vaccinated, society will open up
  • It doesn't come with unreasonable risks: The risk is safe to use and does not impose any other risk or negative side effects

With this structure, you can then assess the situation, buy listing specific questions (the sub-bullets to the three parts of your framework):

• Problem
  • Was there a COVID outbreak and how severe was is?
  • Are media talking about the fatalities and risks associated with COVID?
  • Are people aware what's happening in other countries?
  • Did the government impose any measures?
• Alleviation
  • Which vaccine is available and do people trust the efficacy numbers?
  • Do people have sufficient access to information to know about it and how it will reduce risk of infection?
• Risks
  • How do media and the public think about the risks?
  • Do people trust science/government/pharma to be truthful about risks and side effects?
  • Do people have easy access to the vaccine? 

Once you went through these points, you'll be able to pinpoint the root cause of the lack of interest and develop measures to react. Florian's framework on monetary/non-monetary/information campaigns might be helpful for this.

(edited)

Hi there,

A framework is never "let me first look at the issues, then let me think of solutions, then let me prioritize and implement them".

Every single project/framework inherently contains this, but it's not a framework!

Rather, you need to think through how to increase vaccination interest. To do so, we need a framework that understands the key drivers. Any of the following framework structures work:

1. Ethos, Pathos, Logos (employ these 3 persuasion techniques to get people interested in vaccination)
2. Social, Political, Economic (employ these 3 levers to get vaccinations)
3. Financial, Personal (can you incentivize people or do you need to change their actual minds)

Agree with Florian. There's a tendency for candidates to be more "process" driven in their structuring than "issue" driven. If the question you are trying to solve is increasing the adoption/interest in vaccination, then focusing your structure on the "issues (or hypotheses" why the interest today is low and how that can be mitigated is a more relevant approach.