Hi there,

My experience is that candidates sometimes have a feeling the interview went great when it didn’t and the other way around. Unfortunately companies often neglect to provide in-depth feedback, to avoid any possible risk of being liable for discrimination or similar.

The only real way you have to assess your performance is to get someone that is experienced in MBB interviews (not necessarily a coach) and ask for a detailed feedback on your performance.

If you need more help please feel free to PM me.

Best,
Francesco

Hi there,

Sorry to hear about your experience!

This is really a strange situation and it's hard to say what were the real reasons of the rejection. We can only speculate about it.

As an ex-Mckinsey and part of recruiting team, I can only add that sometimes our mind plays tricks on us and we remember things not the way they really happened! Don't get me wrong, it doesn't mean this is 100% your case.

I agree that it would make sense to take some sessions with a professional coach - to understand what could possibly have gone wrong and how to prevent it in the future.

Hope it helps! Hit me up if you have any further questions.

Cheers, GB

Sorry to hear. There could have many things that happened in the background which you have no control or visibilty of. Most of these companies are pathetic in providing specific feedback. So just leave it and move on. Rejection is part of the process. Every rejection gets your closer to success and to the place where you are meant to be.

Dont let this sway you off course and stick to your plan. Keep practicising and focus on giving your best. Focus on making a positive impact and things will fall into place. Dont feel pressured to prove yourself every 30 sec in the interview...this is when people make mistakes or come across as too eager/desperate/arrogant.

Happy to chat more so feel free to send a direct message.

Hi there,

I couldn't agree more with Ken - you need to hire a coach.

"I really thought it went great". I can't tell you how many coachees I have that think they're phenomenal casers when they aren't (when I first get them, of course). I also have plenty who think they're terrible when they're excellent.

You are not a good judge of your own abilities (sorry, neither am I of my own).

Most companies don't give detailed feedback on interviews. The fact that they said structure, recommendations AND communication means there was a real problem with your casing.

Sorry, but you need an expert opinion from someone who has a vested interest in your success. Only a coach (not a headhunter or another PrepLounger) can give you this.

Hey there,

I 100% agree with Ian and Ken. You need an ex-interviewer (ideally a former Bain interviewer) to benchmark, grade, and evaluate your performance. That could give you an approximation and an as-close-as possible perspective on your case.

However, even then the interviewer has no actual insight into your actual performance during the past interview.

Before you do a McKinsey interview I'd recommend the same - do at least one session w a former McK interviewer to evaluate your performance in the context of the McKinsey assessment criteria.

Cheers,

Florian

Hi A,

sorry to hear about that. It is super frustrating to get a feedback you cannot really make sense of and then from someone you didn't even interview with. However a couple of reactions to what you write

• I seriously doubt that a quota limitation would be a reason for a firm as big as Bain to not hire you when they already interview you (they could have just not done the interview)
• There is a good chance that the headhunter wasn't perfectly briefed on what made the rejection or that he/she simply didn't want to give the full picture because of time reasons
• There is a good chance, that the feedback was kept high-level/ superficial on purpose to avoid legal difficulties (it is much less offensive to say someone was not a fit technically than arguing they were not a fit personally)

Going forward, I would advise to double up your preparation efforts and would try to get a feedback directly from someone you interviewed with. And never underestimate the personal part of the interview process, which is a little different for MBB firms. It is very good that you have your foot in the door with both BCG and McK already - now try to ace both the fit and the case part.

Hope this helps,

Jonas

Hi, I'm sorry to hear it. Unfortunately, the feedback is often generic to make it more fluent, without sharing the specific valuation criteria. Happy to set up a quick call to discuss next steps for your prep plan. I've supported tens of experienced hires in achieving McK offers

Best,
Antonello

I think my rhetoric will be different to the ones above me because I honestly do think you can be self-critical enough to evaluate your interview experience, esp. if you have done it on both sides before, hired a coach etc. Of course, there are other factors that you might not be perceptive to as you are busy solving the case (i.e. interviewer´s impression of every step you make during the interview)

What might have happened, and this is my experience with big companies, is that you could have made some tiny mistakes which in your eyes, as you´re already an experienced consultant, are normal, and definitly they WOULD NOT define your general solving capabilities, BUT as it is a big company, they have to make a decision after seeing many candidates and those tiny details do play a big part...

Hello!

Unfortunately, you won´t any more detailed feedback, not even if you ask for it.

Sorry to hear about what happened, there are many other things that are considered in the decision, some even external to you.

This said, don´t give up! It means you are almost there.

Hope it helps!

Cheers,

Clara

Hi,

Unfortunately, a case interview is a very subjective process. Both on the candidate side and the interviewer side. Moreover, different interviewers would assess your performance differently.

Bain indeed may have the hiring limitations, but I don't believe that they would not pass brilliant candidates. The bar might be higher indeed, but that's, unfortunately, the rules of the game

Best