Hi there,

Usually, experienced hires are more likely to be recruited for specialist roles due to their experience and focus gained over the last couple of years.

However, this is more a function of your resume rather than a requirement set out by the firms. You can also join as a generalist consultant after a few years if you worked across different industries and functions. There is no clear rule and there will be generalist and specialist job ads now and in the future.

All the best with your journey!

Cheers,

Florian

If you're trying to get into the general consulting track, then generalist roles are more preferable. All firms hire specialists for specific roles (industry specific, data science, design thinking, etc.), but those would typically also be focused on their specific expertise within the firms.

Hi there,

Honestly, the short answer is both and neither.

What's going to move the needle is where are you optimally placed.

Given your background, I think you should be applying as a generalist consultant. Eventually, you'll specialize, but you don't seem to be well suited to the specialist role just yet.

Don't worry about what's "easiest" on the general level. What matters a lot more is where they can see you, i.e. where your resume works. This applies to the level you apply in, the role, and the office.

Hello!

Agree with other coaches, both can perfectly be, and it totally dpeends on the value proposition of each person.

Cheers,

Clara

The answer to this is role dependent

If they are looking to fill in a gap in their team then typically they want a specialist that knows enough about the subject matter. (e.g., an expert in clinical trials for immunotherapy)

If they are looking to recruit more people for generalist roles due to growing client demand then they will look for a generalist skillset.

Best,

Udayan