Case

# Wall Inc.

5,9 Tsd. mal gelöst |

## Problemdefinition

Your client, Wall Inc., is a dry wall manufacturer. A new competitor has just entered the market. Since the competitor charges low price company, Wall Inc. is thinking about reducing its price by 20%. The client wants us to evaluate this plan.

## Kommentare

Since this is an interviewer-led case, the interviewer should guide the interviewee through the interview. The questions in the big boxes should be read out to the interviewee.

## Kurzlösung

The client should NOT reduce their price.

## Detaillierte Lösung

Paragraphs highlighted in green indicate diagrams or tables that can be shared in the “Information to share” section.

Paragraphs highlighted in blue can be verbally communicated to the interviewee.

Paragraphs highlighted in orange indicate hints for you how to guide the interviewee through the case.

The following framework would be a good approach:

### I. Impact analysis

#### How will a 20% price reduction impact the client?

Share Table 1 (revenues and cost overview) if inquired by the interviewee.

Information that can be shared on the interviewee’s inquiry:

• The sales volume will remain the same after the price cut.
• The client produces one product.
• The client’s and the competitor’s product are similar.
• All “dry-wall” products in the market are similar.

Before performing calculations, the interviewee should have asked about any potential changes in sales volume.

Total fixed cost

Current situation

After the 20% price cut

Impact

#### How much market share can the client lose before reducing the price by 20% becomes an option?

Let the new volume of sales be equal to x.

New formulas

Profit equivalent to price cut

Loss in market share

The client can afford to lose 33.3% of its market share before reducing the price by 20% becomes an option.

The interviewee should state this!

### II. Competitors / Market / Customers

#### What additional information do you need before you can give a solid recommendation?

The interviewee should find the main factors for solving the problem.

A well-structured plan would include:

• Market (number of competitors and their market share)
• Customer (preferences and price sensitivity)
• Client (position in market, time in the market, brand)

Information that can be shared on the interviewee’s inquiry:

• The competitor is a small company.
• Our main customers are contractors and small business owners. They buy products directly from us.
• Customers usually buy based on their relationship with the suppliers. They prefer certain brands.
• There is no information about price sensitivity.
• We do NOT have no long term contracts with customers.
• There is not much information about the competitor.
• The client has a strong brand presence.
• The client has been in the market for a long time.

Share Diagram 2 (market share overview) if inquired by the interviewee.

Main conclusions

• The client is a relatively big player in a very fragmented market.
• The competitor seems to be only a small player.
• On average the new competitors market share will be around 60/21 = 2.85%
• The new competitor may take 2.85% of our client’s volume or compete with the other small-sized companies.

### III. Conclusion

The interviewee should sum up his/her findings.

The client should NOT reduce the price because it will lead to a loss in profit that is equivalent to losing 33% of market share.

So far, it seems that the new competitor will take a maximum of 3% of the client’s market share.

There are two possible risks though:

• We could have underestimated the size of the new competitor.
• One of our bigger competitors could reduce their price in response to the new competitor’s low prices.

## Schwierige Fragen

### After the new competitor has entered the market, how can our client retain market share?

There are several possible solutions:

• Strengthen its client base
• Create barriers of entry (long term contracts, …)
• Maintain the current price but provide extra services
• Reduce the price to some extent (less than the 20%)

More questions to be added by you, interviewer!

If the interviewee solves the case very quickly, you can come up with more challenging questions to ask them.

Verwandte Consulting-Fragen
Beste Antwort bisher:

Hi, The general framework for pricing is: Cost base - Value based - Competitor based - pricing strategy 1. Cost based - you actually check what are the costs and apply standard industry / target... (mehr)

Bisher beste Antwort von 3 Antworten:

Hi, Focus on the most common industries in the followingpriority (sorted by probability of geting a case): 1-retail and CPG; 2-airlines; 3-Telecom; 4-banking; 5-natural resources; 6-tech There a... (mehr)

Here is my take on this: 1) Market size can be calculated by breaking it down into two: Households and Commercial application. We will concentrate on households: Number of households in Europe (... (mehr)

First ask if the competitor aims to target the same segment(s) that we serve. If so, then: 1- What are the customer segment's needs? 2- What are our comp adv (and link it to #1) 3- What ar... (mehr)

Bisher beste Antwort von 3 Antworten:

Dear Kevin, Your objectives are - to make the transition between the two frameworks fluent - to facilitate your work by gathering before information that will be useful later At this scope... (mehr)

Verwandte BootCamp-Artikel

## Pricing

Pricing case studies can either stand alone or be a part of another case study. You can crack pricing Case Interview in three steps: Investigate the company; Investigate the product; Choose a pricing strategy

3 Kommentar(e)

## Competitive Response

In a competitive response case study, your job is either to analyze what your client should do in response to a move performed by a major competitor or to anticipate what competitors will do in response to a move performed by the client

0 Kommentar(e)

## The Value Chain

The Value Chain - as e.g. by Porter - is a classic framework to structure the activities of a business and add value to products by transforming resources.

3 Kommentar(e)
4.3 (191 Bewertungen)
Case-Exhibits