Melde Dich an und erhalte kostenlosen Zugriff auf über 50 Artikel.
Jetzt kostenlos registrieren >>

BootCamp-Artikel

Gelesene Artikel: 0/52

In a competitive response case, you either need to analyze your client's or its competitors’ moves

In a competitive response case, your job is either to analyze what your client should do in response to a major competitor's strategy or to anticipate what competitors will do in response to a strategy implemented by your client.

Just as with M&A cases, competitive response cases by themselves are rare. Instead, these case types will come disguised as part of a larger business problem. In competitive response cases, it is important to get a good understanding of the current situation and how it can be addressed.

1. Understand the status quo and changes in order to assess the relevance of competitive response

Here too, make sure you fully understand the current situation and how it has changed compared to the past. If, for instance, the case is about a main competitor having introduced a new product, then you will want to know the following:

  • What is the nature of the product and how does it differ from what the client offers?
    1. How important are the new different features to customers?
    2. What will the new features enable the competitor to do? In general, there are two possibilities: a competitor can either charge a higher price for the competing product or take customers away from our client by pricing the product with the differentiating feature competitively against the clients' products.
    3. Why is the competitor introducing it? For instance, have customer preferences changed (need pull) or is there an availability of new technology (technology push)?
  • Which market segment is addressed with the new product and how do we expect these market segments to react?
  • Does the client possess resources that could be used in the context of the new product (expertise, funds, M&A options, production facilities etc.)?

2. Possible recommendations

There is a variety of potential answers to new product introductions. Often, what an interviewer is trying to assess here is your creativity and ability to produce realistic solutions. Potential answers could be:

  • Make the current product more attractive:
    1. Redesign, repackage the current product.
    2. Change the market segment of the current product (move upmarket or downmarket).
    3. Increase the marketing activity (i.e., increase perceived attractiveness).
    4. Build customer loyalty or increase switching costs (e.g., by adding a loyalty scheme).
    5. Make another dimension of the product more attractive (e.g., cut prices).

  • Introduce a different product:
    1. Acquire the competitor or capabilities for the new product.
    2. Copy the competitor with the client's available resources.

  • Do nothing:
    1. Doing nothing can indeed be a recommendation.
    2. Doing nothing can be a strategy if you want to wait for more information so that you are in a better position to make a decision.

Schreibe den ersten Kommentar!
Verwandte Consulting-Fragen
Bisher beste Antwort von 2 Antworten:
Peter
Experte
Ex-Bain & Company Case Team Leader * Placed 40+ MBB candidates as Partner in Europe's leading top-tier Consulting recruiting firm

You never want to use a pre-thought out framework in a case, so I would throw out any notions of having anything ready. What you'll find is the case will be laid out in a way which means that you don'... (mehr)

Bisher beste Antwort von 2 Antworten:
McKinsey / Accenture / Got all BIG3 offers / More than 300 real MBB cases / Harvard Business School

Hi, What company are you targeting? Consulting or private equity? In consulting interviews you may have two types of due diligence cases: Commercial due-diligence of the target company... (mehr)

Bisher beste Antwort von 3 Antworten:
McKinsey Engagement Manager & BCG Consultant | Interviewer at McK & BCG for 7 years | Coached 35+ candidates secure MBB offers

Hi Anonymous, here is a rough high-level description of how I coach my coachees on M&A cases: 1. Clarify the underlying reasons objectives of the potential acquisition. Reasons could be: Gen... (mehr)

Bisher beste Antwort von 4 Antworten:
An
Experte
Uber Strategy Manager | BCG Consultant, Interviewer

Hi there To your question of "core tests", I think there are 2 core tests for considering whether to shut down a business line, post M&A: Strategic alignment: Does the business line align... (mehr)

Beste Antwort bisher:
Ex BCG | MBB Specialist | #1 Expert for coaching sessions (1400+) with 100% recommendation rate

Hi Elisey, I would personally not recommend to use a single framework for all the so-called business situations (M&A, Entry, New product, Operations etc). Although this would help to more easil... (mehr)

Verwandte Cases

Deloitte Consulting Case: Footloose

34,3 Tsd. mal gelöst
4.5 5 11924
| Bewertung: (4.5 / 5.0)

Duraflex ist ein deutscher Schuhhersteller mit einem jährlichen Umsatz von ca. €1 Mrd. Ihr größter Absatzmarkt war immer der Stiefelmarkt. In diesem Markt konkurrieren sie mit drei anderen Hauptkonkurrenten. Im Herbst 2013 startete Badger – einer der Konkurrenten – eine neue Arbeitsstiefellini ... Ganzen Case öffnen

General Holding

23,6 Tsd. mal gelöst
4.3 5 718
| Bewertung: (4.3 / 5.0) |

Der Klient ist eine französische Holding, welche einen jährlichen Umsatz von €1 Milliarde hat. Sie halten fast alle Arten von Unternehmen, die meisten in der „Low tech Herstellung“, darunter unter anderem auch „Öl & Gas“ und „Automobil“ Firmenteile. Es gibt keinen bestimmten Bereich auf den sie i ... Ganzen Case öffnen

Chip equity

20,0 Tsd. mal gelöst
4.5 5 617
| Bewertung: (4.5 / 5.0)

Unser Klient ist Chip’n‘Chip, eine Holding für Unternehmen aus dem Elektronikbereich. Sie möchten in OnBoard, ein Platinen Hersteller, investieren und fragen, ob es eine gute Investition ist. Wie würdest du ihnen helfen? Ganzen Case öffnen